On breach of contract to support| Effect of neglect to collect col-
for life. Shakespeare v. Markham, lateral. Hazard v. Wells, 2 AW.
10 Hun, 311.
New Cas. 444.
For breach of agreement to fur-
nish board or support. Candy v.
Candy, 10 Iun, 88.
On breach of warranty of plants.
Schutt v. Baker, 9 Hun, 556.
For pollution of water-course.
Chipman v. Palmer, 9 Iun, 517.
Neglect of creditor, discharging
grantee of mortgaged premises.
Russell v. Weinberg, 2 Alb. New
Cas. 422.
Collateral security for an ante-
cedent debt. Grocers' Bank .
Penfield, 2 Abb. New Cas. 305.
In mother's action for seduction.
Hitchman v. Whitney, 9 Hun, 512.
For trespass, determined by the By fraudulent composition deed.
value of the logs as they lay upon Whiteside v. Hyman, 10 Hun, 218.
the land. Firmin. Firmin, 9 By mere concealment without
Hun, 571.
fraudulent representation. Getty
When exemplary are allowed. v. Donelly, 9 Hun, 603.
Voltz v. Blackmar, 64 N. Y. 440; Scienter: representation with-
Samuels v. Evening Mail Assoc., 9 out knowledge. Morehouse v.
Hun, 288.
Yeager, 41 Super. Ct. (J. & S.) 135.
By statements in ignorance,
but a suming to know. Bishop *.
Action for negligent killing— Davis, 9 Hun, 342.
right of jury to allow interest.
Cook v. N. Y. C. & H. R. R. R.
Co., 10 Hun, 426.
Exaggeration of amounts held
to be false representations. West-
cott v. Ainsworth, 9 Iun, 53.
Mere falsehood or deception does
DEBTOR AND CREDITOR. not give cause of action. Injury
Remedy under bankrupt act and must be shown. Hauselt . Vil-
under State laws, contrasted.mar, 2 Abb. New Cas. 222.
Dieckerhoff v. Ahlborn, 2 Abb. New
Cas. 372; Matter of Backer, Id. 379.
Receipt in full by one refusing
Of street by deed. Grinnell v.
to sign composition deed. Bliss v. Kirtland, 2 Alb. New Cas. 386.
Shwarts, 65 N. Y. 444.
Action for damages by fraudu-
Without attestation or acknowl-
edgment. Roggen v. Avery, 65
General direction to pay debts N. Y. 592; 63 Barb. 65.
does not change order of marshal- Effectual, before acknowledg-
ing assets. Heermans v. Robert-ment and certification. Carnes v.
son, 64 N. Y. 332.
Platt, 41 Super. Ct. (J. & S.) 435.
Pledgor of mortgage may fore- Rules of interpretation: excep-
close. Simson v. Satterlee, 64 N. tions: conditions: incumbrances.
Y. 657.
Anonymous, 2 Abb. New Cas. 56.
Construction of grant of water-|
course. Barber v. Nye, 05 N. Y.
211.
Language effecting dedication
Requisites of notice and remedy
for want of, in case of deposition
de bene esse. Elverson v. Van-
of way. v. 2
Grinnell . Kirtland, derpoel, 41 Super. Ct. (J. & S.)
Abb. New Cus. 386.
Reservation of easement in base-
ment. Ref. Ch. G. v. School-
craft, 65 N. Y. 134; 5 Lans. 206.
Grant of easement, when de-
fined by first exercise. Ev. Lu.
St. J. O. H. v. Buffalo Hydraulic
Assoc. 64 N. Y. 561; 6 T. & C.
589; 4 Hun, 419.
257. Compare Code of Civ. Pro.
$882.
Affidavit to perpetuate testi-
mony. Byrne. Mulligan, 41
Super. Ct. (J. & S.) 515. Com-
pare Code of Civ. Pro. § 873.
Examination on commission-
answers to cross-interrogatories—
by whom they may be read in
evidence. Marshall v. Watertown
Condition, subsequent in deed,
may be an incumbrance. Apony- Steam Engine Co., 10 Hun, 463.
mous, 2 Abb. New Cas. 56.
Description by street lines and
change of street lines. White's
When deposition is not sup-
pressed because executed by one of
several. O'Brien v. Commercial Fire
Bank of Buffalo v. Nichols, 64 N. Ins. Co., 41 Super. Ct. (J. & S.) 224.
Description in survey, must com-
mence at place of beginning.
Elliott v. Lewis, 10 Iun, 486.
Monuments, &c., do not always
control distance. Higginbotham
v. Stoddard, 9 Hun, 1.
Conditions and reservations,
when personal. Pierce v. Keator,
9 Hun, 532.
Deed subject to
FLICTING CLAIMS.
When action or special proceed-
Schroeder v.
mortgage. ing is maintainable.
Barthet v. Elias, 2 Abb. New Cas. Gurney, 10 Пun, 413.
Disclaimer; burden of proof.
Assuming mortgage. Effect of Davis v. Read, 65 N. Y. 566.
neglect to foreclose. Russell v.
Weinberg, 2 Abb. New Cas. 422.
Another action pending. Ratzer
v. Ratzer, 2 Abb. New Cas. 461.
Before suit, after taking check.
Smith v. Newland, 9 Hun, 553.
Effect of concealment of will. [ceedings to go to the city treasury.
Cole v. Gourlay, 9 Hun, 493.
L. 1876, p. 333, c. 356.
DISCONTINUANCE.
What must be shown upon ap-
Mode of trial in. Sullivan €.
plication for, on ground of settle-Sullivan, 41 Super. Ct. (J. & S.)
ment. Connors v. Titus, 10 Hun,
235.
Necessity of proof of no foreign
divorce. L. 1877, p. 179, c. 168,
When consent to discontinuance and 2 R. 8. c. 8, tit. 1, art. 3, § 42.
without costs, does not preclude Rents and profits, how reached
plaintiff from moving for a refer-by sequestration. Foster . Town-
ence. Palmer v. Foley, 2 Abb. New shend, 2 Abb. New Cas. 29.
Cas. 191.
Foreign divorce, impeachable
Trial fee on discontinuance; for fraud. Baker's Will, 2 Redf.
effect of non-payment cf costs. Surr. 179.
Sutphen. Lash, 10 Hun, 120.
Taxable costs presumptively full
compensation. Wright o. Wright,
41 Super. Ct. (J. & S.) 432.
DISCOVERY AND INSPEC-
TION.
Physician's account books, when
not subject to. Mott v. Consum-
ers' Ice Co., 2 Abb. New Cas. 143.
Domicile of parties; personal
service when dispensed with; juris-
diction of court. Hunt . Hunt,
9 Hun, 622.
Protected in creditor's action.
Lowry v. Smith, 9 Hun, 514.
Protected against fraudulent
conveyance on the eve of mar-
riage. Youngs v. Carter, 10 Hun,
194.
Forfeited, not by adultery but
DISORDERLY PERSONS.
Complaint; certiorari; wife,
when competent witness. People by judgment of divorce therefor.
Schiffer v. Pruden, 64 N. Y. 47; 7
J. & S. 167.
ex rel. Smith v. Commrs. of Pub.
Charities, 9 Hun, 212.
Disorderly houses. Barnesciotta
v. People, 10 Hun, 137.
DISTRIBUTION.
Statute of distribution requires
blood relationship. Gazlay v.
Cornwell, 2 Redf. Surr. 139.
DISTRICT COURTS (OF THE CITY
Jurisdiction in summary pro- 167.
ceedings. L. 1877, p. 200, c. 187.
And see L. 1876, p. 333, c. 356,
§ 1.
What constitutes. White .
Costs and fees in summary pro-[Baxter, 41 Super. Ct. (J. & S.) 358.
As to light and air. Doyle v.
64 N. Y. 432; 7 J. & S.
ELECTIONS (OF OFFICERS).
General Law (1842, 1872) amd'd
in § 6, subd. 3, L. 1877, p. 343,
Publication of State canvasser's
Ancient lights. Shipman v. proceedings. L. 1876, p. 285, c.
Beers, 2 Abb. New Cas. 435.
Right to use water from spring
on another's land. Merrill v. Cal-
kins, 10 Iun, 495.
Powers and functions of board
of county canvassers. Hankins v.
Mayor, &c. of N. Y., 64 N. Y. 18.
Established by uninterrupted Compensation of presidential
enjoyment. Law v. McDonald, 9 electors. L. 1877, p. 30, c. 28,
Hun, 23.
amd'g 1 R. S. c. 6, tit. 6, art. 3, §
Limits of, how fixed under
grant. Ev. Lu. St. J. O. H. v.
Buffalo Hydraulic Assoc., 64 N.
Y. 561; 6 T. & C. 589; 4 Hun,
Not lost by claiming fee. White's
Bank of Buffalo v. Nichols, 64 N.
Y. 65.
Possession under claim of title.
Porter v. McGrath, 41 Super. Ct.
(J. & S.) 84.
EMBEZZLEMENT.
By trustees, &c. punished. L.
1877, p. 226, c. 208.
EMINENT DOMAIN.
Notice to persons affected by
exercise of-damages. Long Isl-
and R. R. Co. v. Bennett, 10 Hun,
91.
ERROR (WRIT of).
When a stay of proceedings.
Equitable defense involving new L. 1876, p. 77, c. 95.
parties. Webster v. Bond, 9 Hun,
437. Compare Code of Civ. Pro.
Against claiming forfeiture of
Rents and profits recoverable in. insurance policy. Pechner
Grout v. Cooper, 9 Iun, 326.
Sub-tenant's emblements.
son v. Rose, 65 N. Y. 411.
Effect of judgment as evidence; igan Centr. R. R. Co., 65 N. Y.
right of redemption; judgment 111; 3 J. & S. 563.
concludes title. Cagger v. Lan- Certificate against usury, no es-
sing, 64 N. Y. 417.
toppel in favor of one knowing
Six months to redeem, under 2 the facts. Nichols v. Nussbaum,
R. S. 506, section 33. Witbeck v. 10 Hun, 214.
Van Rensselaer, 64 N. Y. 27.
Creditor not estopped by knowl-
Redemption sought by supple-edge of fraudulent conveyance.
mental complaint. Madison Ave. Cole v. Tyler, 65 N. Y. 73.
Bapt. Church v. Bapt. Church in Against defense of ultra vires.
Oliver St., 41 Super. Ct. (J. & S.) Bushnell v. Chautauqua Co. Nat.
Bank, 10 Hun, 378.
Municipality not estopped by Statute of frauds not presumed
conduct of individuals or officers. to exist in other States. Wilcox
Weismer. Village of Douglas, 64 Silver Plate Co. v. Green, 9 Hun,
N. Y. 91; 6 T. & C. 514; 4 Hun, 347.
201.
Presumption as to ground of
Instance of estoppel for consis-granting new trial on condition of
tency's sake without evidence of payment of costs. Henderson .
fraud, &c. Easterly v. Barber, 65 Henderson, 2 Abb. Nw Cas. 102.
N. Y. 252.
I. JUDICIAL NOTICE.
Ordinance establishing width of
sidewalk, not judicially noticed.
Porter v. Waring, 2 Abb. New Cas.
Presumption of notice of disso-
lution. Wood v. Erie Railw. Co.,
9 Hun, 648.
Presumption of innocence. Mc-
Court v. People, 64 N. Y. 583.
Date of deed, how far presump-
tive evidence. Carnes v. Platt, 41
Super. Ct. (J. & S.) 435.
Judicial notice of extent of ces- Neglecting to file report in one
sions to the State, and of Indian year does not raise presumption of
title and occupancy. Howard v. subsequent neglect; evidence as
Moot, 64 N. Y. 262; 2 Hun, 475; to debt. Whitney Arms Co. v.
5 T. & C. 427.
II. PRESUMPTIONS.
Presumptions as to advance-
ments. Piper v. Barse, 2 Redf.
Surr. 19.
Highway presumed to continue.
Beckwith v. Whalen, 65 N. Y.
322; 5 Lans. 378.
Barlow, 41 Super. Ct. (J. & S.) 220.
Presumption of execution of
trust. Porter v. McGrath, 41 Super.
Ct. (J. & S.) 84.
Deed, presumptive evidence of
regularity of assessment sale.
Nichols v. Vorhis, 9 Hun, 171.
Presumption as to payment of
assessment, arising from lapse of
Plaintiff in ejectment presumed time. Matter of Serrill, 9 Hun,
in possession. Samson v. Rose, 05 233.
N. Y. 411.
Presumption of death from ab-
A grant cannot be presumed sence and old age. Matter of Ack-
when the making of it would be
contrary to law. Burbank v. Fay,
65 N. Y. 57; 5 Lans. 397.
erman, 2 Redf. Surr. 521.
Presumption of father's authority
to receive payment due child. Mer-
The fact that one was sworn as ritt v. Cole, 9 Hun, 98.
a witness does not raise a presump- Advertisement defacing scenery
tion of law that he had notice of presumed to be authorized. L.
the nature of the action,-for in- 1877, p. 529, c. 451.
stance, to charge him with know-
ledge of an assignment of the
claim, but is only evidence for the
jury. Heermans v. Stewart, 64 N. will.
P. 159; 3 Hun, 473.
Burden as to undue influence in
Baker's Will, 2 Redf. Surr.
|