« ΠροηγούμενηΣυνέχεια »
DECISIONS OF THE COURTS
STATE OF NEW YORK.
WITH AN ANALYTICAL INDEX TO ALL POINTS OF
LAW AND PRACTICE
- 5 FEB 1963
Entered according to act of Congress, in the year 1877,
By WARD & PELOUBET, In the Office of the Librarian of Congress at Washington.
Page 361. The following should have been named as counsel in Keiley o. Dusenbury:
Charles Blandy (Hall & Blandy, attorneys), for the motion.
Page 365. The following should have been named as counsel in Barthet o. Elias:
Sigismund Kaufmann and R. B. Tunstall (Kaufmann, Tunstall & Wagner, attorneys), for plaintiff.
Edgar A. Turrell, for defendants.
Page 383. The following should have been named as counsel in the Matter of Backer:
W. B. Putney, for Abraham Backer.
G. A. Seixas and Thomas Allison, for Nathan & Co. and A. Hoffnung.
JOSEPITILAL 0. HEYMAN...... Attorney and client: Examin-