Cases not Otherwise Reported. R. C. Dale and Mr. Samuel Dickson for appellants. Mr. R. L. Ashhurst for appellee. No. 68. NEW ORLEANS WATER WORKS COMPANY V. MAGINNIS OIL AND SOAP WORKS. Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Louisiana. November 16, 1891: Decree affirmed, with costs, by a divided court. Mr. J. R. Beckwith for appellant. Mr. T. L. Bayne, Mr. George Denegre, Mr. C. W. Hornor, Mr. W. S. Benedict and Mr. George A. King for appellee. No. 67. NEW ORLEANS WATER WORKS COMPANY V. PEOPLE'S ICE MANUFACTURING COMPANY. Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Louisiana. November 16, 1891: Decree affirmed, with costs, by a divided court. Mr. J. R. Beckwith for appellant. Mr. Alfred Goldthwaite for appellee. No. 66. NEW ORLEANS WATER WORKS COMPANY v. SOUTHERN BREWING COMPANY. Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Louisiana. November 16, 1891: Decree affirmed, with costs, by a divided court. Mr. J. R. Beckwith for appellant. Mr. Alfred Goldthwaite for appellee. No. 8. NETHERCLIFT v. ROBERTSON. Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York. October 13, 1891: Dismissed, with costs, on authority of counsel for plaintiffs in error, on motion of Mr. Solicitor General for defendant in error. Mr. Henry E. Tremain and Mr. A. J. Willard for plaintiffs in error. Mr. Attorney General for defendant in error. Error to the No. 213. O'DONNELL v. TOWN OF SOUTHFIELD. Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Cases not Otherwise Reported. New York. March 1, 1892: Dismissed, per stipulation. Mr. Charles C. Bull for plaintiff in error. Mr. Henry Greenfield for defendant in error. No. 79. OLESON v. Cox. Error to the Supreme Court of the State of Kansas. November 3, 1891: Dismissed, with costs, pursuant to the 10th rule. Mr. Oscar Foust for plaintiff in error. No appearance for defendant in error. No. 95. PACIFIC EXPRESS COMPANY v. TAXING DISTRICT OF SHELBY COUNTY, TENNESSEE. Error to the Supreme Court of the State of Tennessee. November 9, 1891: Judgment reversed, with costs, per stipulation, and cause remanded, to be proceeded with according to law and justice. Mr. R. J. Morgan for plaintiff in error. Mr. S. P. Walker for defendant in error. No. 333. PERKINS v. HANEY MANUFACTURING COMPANY. Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Western District of Michigan. April 20, 1892: Dismissed, with costs, pursuant to the 10th rule. Mr. C. J. Hunt for appellant. Mr. Edward Taggart for appellees. No. 1066. PITRAT v. HULL. Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of Ohio. September 8, 1891: Dismissed, pursuant to the 28th rule. Mr. O. M. Gottschall for appellants. Mr. Alfred Russell for appellee. No. 1559. POST v. COUNTY OF PULASKI. May 16, 1892 : Petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied, with costs. Mr. John F. Dillon and Mr. Harry Hubbard for petitioner. Mr. Lewis M. Bradley for respondent. Cases not Otherwise Reported. No. 219. PRICE v. DETROIT, GRAND HAVEN AND MILWAUKEE RAILWAY COMPANY. Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Michigan. March 28, 1892: Judgment affirmed, with costs, by a divided court. Mr. Don M. Dickinson and Mr. Elliot G. Stevenson for plaintiff in error. Mr. Elijah W. Meddaugh and Mr. W. A. Day for defendant in error. No. 273. QUONG LEE LUM v. RANKIN. Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of California. March 31, 1892: Dismissed, with costs, pursuant to the 10th rule. Mr. Thomas D. Riordan for appellant. No appearance for appellee. No. 942. RALSTON V. BRITISH AND AMERICAN MORTGAGE COMPANY. Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Western District of Louisiana. November 9, 1891: Dismissed, with costs, pursuant to the 15th rule. Mr. Wade R. Young for appellant. Mr. James Lowndes for appellees. No. 1245. REYNES v. FRY. Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York. December 7, 1891: Dismissed, per stipulation, without costs to either party. Mr. John E. Parsons for appellant. Mr. John M. Bowers for appellee. Error to the Superior January 26, 1892: Dis No. 1054. RICHARDSON V. BRYAN. Court of the State of Massachusetts. missed, with costs, on authority of counsel for plaintiff in error. Mr. Lewis S. Dabney and Mr. Frederic Cunningham for plaintiff in error. No appearance for defendant in error. No. 537. DYKEMAN. RICHMOND AND DANVILLE RAILROAD COMPANY v. Cases not Otherwise Reported. for the Northern District of Georgia. December 14, 1891: Dismissed, per stipulation, on motion of Mr. Linden Kent for plaintiff in error. Mr. Linden Kent for plaintiff in error. Mr. N. J. Hammond for defendant in error. No. 203. RUMFORD CHEMICAL WORKS v. MUTH. Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Maryland. October 26, 1891: Dismissed, with costs, on authority of counsel for appellant. Mr. Rowland Cox for appellant. No appearance for appellees. No. 321. ST. JOHN v. CITY OF TOLEDO, OHIO. Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of Ohio. April 14, 1892: Dismissed, with costs, pursuant to the 10th rule. Mr. R. P. Ranney for plaintiff in error. Mr. W. H. H. Read and Mr. Clarence Brown for defendants in error. No. 367. ST. LOUIS, IRON MOUNTAIN AND SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY v. HUMPHREYS. Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York. March 7, 1892: Dismissed, per stipulation. Mr. John F. Dillon for plaintiff in error. Mr. George De Forest Lord for defend ants in error. No. 438. ST. PAUL, MINNEAPOLIS AND MANITOBA RAILWAY COMPANY V. STATE OF MINNESOTA ex rel. CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS. Error to the District Court of Hennepin County, State of Minnesota. January 4, 1892: Dismissed, with costs, per stipulation. Mr. M. D. Grover for plaintiff in error. Mr. Robert D. Russell for defendant in error. No. 22. SCHILLINGER v. CRANFORD. Appeal from the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia. October 13, 1891: Dismissed, with costs, pursuant to the 10th rule. Mr. J. E. Cases not Otherwise Reported. McDonald, Mr. R. J. Bright, Mr. J. C. Fay and Mr. U. M. Young for appellants. Mr. Enoch Totten for appellees. No. 91. SCHUYLER'S STEAM TOW BOAT LINE v. SALISBURY. Error to the Supreme Court of the State of New York. November 6, 1891: Dismissed, with costs, for failure to comply with the order of this court of October 19, 1891, requiring new bond on writ of error. Mr. W. Frothingham for plaintiff in error. Mr. J. Rider Cady for defendant in error. No. 179. SCRUGGS v. UNITED STATES. Appeal from the Court of Claims. January 28, 1892: Dismissed, pursuant to the 10th rule. Mr. George A. King for appellant. Mr. Attorney General for appellee. No. 141. SHORT v. SULLY. Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of Texas. December 14, 1891: Dismissed, with costs, on authority of counsel for plaintiff in error. Mr. A. S. Lathrop for plaintiff in Mr. Van H. Manning for defendants in error. error. No. 1145. SIOUX CITY AND PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY v. SMITH, COMMISSIONERS, &c. Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of Iowa. March 10, 1892: Dismissed, with costs, on motion of Mr. W. C. Goudy for appellant. Mr. W. C Goudy and Mr. N. M. Hubbard for appellant. No appearance for appellees. No. 1015. SLOAN V. STRICKLER. Court of the State of Colorado. missed, for the want of jurisdiction. W. T. Hughes for plaintiffs in error. defendant in error. Error to the Supreme December 14, 1891: DisMr. L. S. Dixon and Mr. Mr. V. D. Markham for |