Εικόνες σελίδας
PDF
Ηλεκτρ. έκδοση

Cases not Otherwise Reported.

No. 1431. UNITED STATES v. GOODRICH. Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Arkansas. April 18, 1892: Dismissed, on motion of Mr. Solicitor General for appellant. Mr. Attorney General for appellant. Mr. U. M. Rose and Mr. G. B. Rose for appellee.

No. 1348. UNITED STATES v. HAZELTINE. Appeal from the Court of Claims. November 9, 1891: Dismissed, per stipulation, on motion of Mr. Solicitor General for appellant. Mr. Attorney General for appellant. Mr. C. C. Lancaster for appellee.

No. 1028. UNITED STATES v. JULIAN. Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Middle District of Tennessee. May 2, 1892: Decree reversed, per stipulation, and cause remanded to be proceeded in according to law. Mr. Attorney General for appellant. Mr. George A. King for appellee.

No. 1029. UNITED STATES v. JULIAN. Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Middle District of Tennessee. May 2, 1892 Decree reversed, per stipulation, and cause remanded to be proceeded in according to law. Mr. Attorney General for appellant. Mr. George A. King for appellee.

No. 1030. UNITED STATES v. JULIAN. Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Middle District of Tennessee. May 2, 1892: Decree' reversed, per stipulation, and cause remanded to be proceeded in according to law. Mr. Attorney General for appellant. Mr. George A. King for

No. 594. UNITED STATES v. MCLEAN. Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Kansas. October 26, 1891: Dismissed, on motion of Mr. Solicitor General

Cases not Otherwise Reported.

for plaintiff in error. Mr. Attorney General for plaintiff in error. No appearance for defendant in error.

No. 704. UNITED STATES v. NORRELL. Appeal from the Third Judicial District Court of the Territory of Utah. February 1, 1892: Decree reversed as to the docket fees charged therein, and affirmed as to the residue of the fees therein, per stipulation, and cause remanded, with directions to enter a decree in accordance with the stipulation of counsel, on motion of Mr. Solicitor General for appellant. Mr. Attorney General for appellant. Mr. O. B. Hallam for appellee.

No. 1474. UNITED STATES V. PERRY. Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Kansas. April 18, 1892: Dismissed, on motion of Mr. Solicitor General for appellant. Mr. Attorney General for appellant. No appearance for appellee.

No. 142. UNITED STATES v. RUGGLES. Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York. December 7, 1891: Dismissed, on motion of Mr. Solicitor General for plaintiff in error. Mr. Attorney General for plaintiff in error. Mr. T. W. Osborn for defendants in

error.

No. 76. UNITED STATES V. UNION COAL COMPANY. Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Colorado. November 23, 1891: Decree affirmed by a divided court. Mr. Attorney General and Mr. Assistant Attorney General Maury for appellant. Mr. John F. Dillon and Mr. Harry Hubbard for appellee.

No. 238. WALL v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA.. Appeal from the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia. March

Cases not Otherwise Reported.

23, 1892: Dismissed, with costs, pursuant to the 10th rule. Mr. W. W. Upton for appellant. No appearance for appellees.

No. 1450. WAUTON V. DEWOLF. Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of California. November 3, 1891: Docketed and dismissed, with costs, on motion of Mr. A. B. Browne for appellees.

No. 237. WEDGE BLOCK PAVEMENT COMPANY v. CITY OF CLEVELAND. Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of Ohio. October 26, 1891: Dismissed, with costs, on authority of counsel for appellant. Mr. J. E. Ingersoll for appellant. No appearance for appellees.

No. 107. WILLIAMS v. GLENN. Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Western District of North Carolina. November 19, 1891: Dismissed, with costs, pursuant to the 10th rule. Mr. W. E. Earle, Mr. W. D. Davidge and Mr. Reginald Fendall for plaintiff in error. Mr. Charles Marshall and Mr. John Howard for defendant in error.

No. 112. WILLIAMS. GLENN. Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Western District of North Carolina. November 23, 1891: Dismissed, with.costs, pursuant to the 10th rule. Mr. W. E. Earle, Mr. W. D. Davidge and Mr. Reginald Fendall for plaintiff in error. Mr. Charles Marshall and Mr. John Howard for defendant in error.

No. 1422. WILLIAMS v. WILLIAMS. Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Kansas. October 13, 1891: Docketed and dismissed, with costs, on motion of Mr. W. T. S. Curtis for appellee.

Cases not Otherwise Reported.

No. 251. WILSON V. HAMMACHER. Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Massachusetts. January 20, 1892: Dismissed, with costs, per stipulation. Mr. M. F. Dickinson, Jr., for appellant. Mr. D. S. Linscott for appellee.

No. 1558. WISE v. BENNETT. May 16, 1892: Petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied, with costs. Mr. James Thomson for petitioner. Mr. Robert H. Smith for respondents.

No. 85. WOODRUFF v. CARR. Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Minnesota. November 5, 1891: Dismissed, with costs, pursuant to the 10th rule. Mr. C. K. Offield for appellant. No appearance for appellee.

No. 320. WORTHINGTON V. ESTES. Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York. January 28, 1892: Dismissed, per stipulation, on motion of Mr. G. G. Frelinghuysen for appellees. Mr. E. E. Anderson for appellant. Mr. J. L. S. Roberts and Mr. G. G. Frelinghuysen for appellees.

No. 109. WRISTON V. GLENN. Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Western District of North Carolina. November 20, 1891: Dismissed, with costs, pursuant to the 10th rule. Mr. W. E. Earle, Mr. W. L. Davidge and Mr. Reginald Fendall for plaintiff in error. Mr. Charles Marshall and Mr. John Howard for defendant in error.

APPENDIX.

SUMMARY STATEMENT OF BUSINESS OF THE SUPREME Court of THE UNITED STATES FOR OCTOBER TERM, 1891,

[merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small]

Number of cases on the appellate docket at the close of
October Term, 1890, not disposed of.

Number of cases docketed during October Term, 1891

Total . .

Number of cases disposed of, October Term, 1891 .

Number of cases remaining undisposed of.

Number of cases continued under advisement from October

[merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][ocr errors][ocr errors][merged small][ocr errors][merged small]

1190

[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]

379

[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]

1569

496

1073

12

242

78

30

11

185

103

97

105

2

[ocr errors]

Dismissed settled, and by authority of appts, and P. E.

Dismissed after submission on briefs and under various rules,
Questions answered

[ocr errors][ocr errors]

Denial of petitions for writs of certiorari under act of

March 3, 1891 .

663

« ΠροηγούμενηΣυνέχεια »