Impressment, abandonment of, sine qua non of treaty vi 175 427 Monroe and Pinkney's project of equivalent for vi 317 on high seas, British assertion of right of vi 323 British note for security against vi 329 421 cause of the war with Great Britain viii 362 394 of British subjects in their ports from our vessels ad- stop to, condition of armistice i 54 70 79 redress against practice of, a principal object of war of British subjects in their ports from our vessels de- mode of preventing necessity of ix 340 submission to, how to be regarded ix 347 satisfactory stipulation against to be obtained ix 356 stipulation against for specified time, if war in Europe ceases, important ix 368 stipulation on the subject of, permitted to be left out Inaugural. See Address. Indemnification for spoliations of Great Britain claimed 223 224 instructions for obtaining vi 246 272 why not obtained vi 348 369-374 vi 221 Indemnity for spoliations of France under decrees, subsequent to Berlin and Milan, to be claimed viii of Britain under orders in council to be claimed ix 60 71 of Spain ix 206 Independence of West Florida vii 485 not recognised by us vii 488 Indians, acquisitions from iv 495 Indians, employed by British in war, unjustifiably ix 51 to be included in the pacification, British sine qua non British note for ix 420 agreed to by our plenipotentiaries ix 425 Insurrection in Pennsylvania ii 82 Intercourse-non, act of, consequences of vii 205 223 met by reprisals on the part of France deserved to be met by war vii 273 468 472 by Britain vii 460 Interpolations in the law of nations Isaacsen, consul's letter on Danish spoliations, 11 Aug. 1809 vii 321 do do do explanations, 4 Nov. vii 278 circular to consuls, informing of his dismissal, 13 Nov. vii 302 Jay's treaty, effect of expiration of vi 173 offer to renew vi 187 objections to renewal vi 189 letter to lord Grenville, on impressment, 30 July, 1794 ix 29 do impressment, 11 July, 1792 do viii 492 12 Oct. viii 493 6 Nov. viii 494 Jackson to Pickering, no reason to believe a British plan against Jay, nomination of, to the Senate, 16 April, 1794 ii 253 to Genet, on French violations of jurisdiction, 5 June i 80 on arrest of armed vessel at New York, 17 June Jefferson to Genet, on seizure of an English privateer, 23 June i 109 112 on vessels taken within our jurisdiction, 25 June on the case of the William, 29 June i 115 belligerent property in our ships liable to cap- on prizes brought by French into our ports, 7 to Morris, requesting recall of Genet, 16 Aug. i 137-155 156 to Hammond, on French privateers and prizes, 5 Sept. i 165 to French consuls, forbidding exercise of Admiralty juris to Genet, on French prizes, 9 Sept. i 167 to Hammond, on presence of French fleet on our coast, 9 to Van Berckel, i 9 Sept. 172 175 to Genet, readiness to prevent hostile preparations against France, 12 Sept. commission of French consuls, 2 Oct. i 178 to Duplaine, revoking his exequatur, S Oct. i 179 3 Oct. i 191 to Genet, on plan of collecting French naval force for our on extent of our territorial jurisdiction, 8 Nov. i 195 on taking evidence as to captures within our ju- returning consuls commissions not addressed to demanding release of prizes, 22 Nov. i 200 to Hammond, on execution of the terms of treaty of peace, proposing to treat, 13 Dec. i 214 specifying British conduct in contravention desiring information of certain documents, Jefferson to Hammond, in answer to his specification of cases of in- pressing the subject of negotiation, as set forth in his last letter, 19 June, 1793 i 389 to Thomas Pinckney, on British instructions to ships of war, his report on the privileges and restrictions of our commerce to Gov. Shelby, on French officers exciting hostile prepa- Julian, case of the viii 319 ii 36 6 Nov. ii 37 Jurisdiction, neutral, at sea, how far vi 262 provided for in Monroe and Pinkney's treaty, how vi violation of, with lawless proceedings, cause of war Kempers, papers relative to their seizure V 103 King to Pickering, on insufficient blockade of the Texel, 15 July, 1799 vii 390 to lord Grenville, on law of blockade, 23 May, 1799 vii 391 do 13 April, 1797 ix 31 do 15. March, 1799 ix 32 July, 1803 ix 34 Kindelan to Mitchell, requesting him to withdraw troops from East Florida, 11 June, 1812 ix 165 desire to remove all doubts and difficulties, no idea of hostility, 23.June ix 192 King to Pickering, conduct of French to other neutrals, beside us, torture inflicted by French privateers on our Liston to Pickering, no expedition against Louisiana has been in- project once suggested of an expedition against 317 request for orders to deliver Thomas Nash to justice, 23 May, 1799 iv 303 Lear, consul's letters about Tripoli v 195 treaty with Tripoli v 441 letter to Madison, difficulties with Algiers, 28 March, 1808 vii 70 do do 31 March vii 73 Lear, consul's letter to Monroe, quarrel with Algiers, 29 July, 1812 Lee, attorney general's opinion against delivery of vessels, retaken by v 53 Liston's letter to Pickering, against recaptures of our vessels by do project for security of seamen, 4 Feb. Little Belt, affair of the British sloop of war viii 44 104 112 Liverpool, lord, letter to sir George Prevost, recommending John Henry, 16 Sept. 1811 viii 288 printed again viii 290 to Russell, requesting examination of Bowman's 382 to governour of Lower Canada, directing attempts 432 Louisiana, acquisition of iv 494 499 v 19 31 62 453 happy for the nation, why iv 50 northern boundary of vi 170 Madison, secretary's report on case of the Henrick, 22 Feb. 1803 V 47 letter to Monroe, 12 April, 1805 v 212 vi 180 do 5 Jan. 1804 V 309 letter to general Eaton, 20 May, 1801 V 392 VOL. IX. 432 do to consul Lear, June, 1804, April 1805 v 433 1804 |