Εικόνες σελίδας
PDF
Ηλεκτρ. έκδοση

him, neither in this world, neither | in the world to come.

[ocr errors]

66

33 Either make the tree good, and his fruit good; or else make think) be concluded, that to speak against the Holy Ghost (as those Pharisees did) was therefore not to be forgiven in that age, or in the age to come, because no means of obtaining forgiveness for it was to be found, either in the Jewish law, or under the Christian dispensation; but that, however, upon their repentance, they might be forgiven, and admitted to the divine favor." I add the testimony of Gilpin, an approved commentator, to the same point. Nobody can suppose, considering the whole tenor of Christianity, that there can be any sin, which on repentance may not be forgiven. This therefore seems only a strong way of expressing the difficulty of such repentance, and the impossibility of forgiveness without it. Such an expression occurs, Matt. xix. 24, 'It is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle, than for a rich man to enter the kingdom of heaven;' that is, it is very difficult. That the Pharisees were not beyond the reach of forgiveness, on their repentance, seems to be plain from ver. 41, where the repentance of Nineveh is held out to them for an example." See Univ. Guide, pp. 97-102; Selections, sect. xxi.

the seculum futurum, the age to come, or the Christian dispensation, no forgiveness could be expected for such as these Pharisees were; because, when they blasphemed the holy spirit of God, by which Jesus wrought his miracles, they rejected the only means of forgiveness, which was the merit of his death, applied to men by faith, and which, under Christianity, was the only sacrifice that could atone for such a sin: in this sense, (as things then stood with them,) their sin was an unpardonable one. But then it is not to be concluded from hence, that, if they repented of this blasphemy, they could not be forgiven. The observation of Athanasius, vol. i., p. 237, Ed. Col., is very material. He says, Christ does not say, to him that blasphemeth and repenteth, but to him that blasphemeth; and therefore he means, to him that continueth in his blasphemy; for with God there is no sin that is unpardonable.' And the truth of this observation will appear from the following instances. Jesus said, in Matt. x. 33, 'Whosoever shall dený me before men, him will I deny before my Father,' where the threatening is as strong as this in the case of blasphemy against the Holy Ghost; 33. Either make the tree good, &c. and yet, when Peter shortly afterwards This verse is understood by some as denied Jesus before men three times, referring to the charge of performing joining oaths and curses with his deni- miracles by the power of Beelzebub :als, yet, upon his repenting and weeping be consistent in your allegations; either bitterly, he was not only forgiven, but show that my doctrines and conduct are continued in his apostleship. Again, such as to justify the belief that I am in when Jesus was on the cross, some of league with Satan, or, if my doctrines the rulers 'derided him, saying, he and conduct be good, acknowledge that saved others, let him save himself, if he my works are wrought by divine power; be Christ, the chosen of God.' Luke for as a tree is known by its fruits, so xxiii. 35. By which words it appears the true character and conduct of an that they acknowledged Jesus to have individual will be found to correspond. wrought miracles, and yet rejected him, Others understand it as referring to the denying that he wrought them by the Jews themselves, or as an introduction holy spirit of God; and yet Jesus to the succeeding verse:-be consistent prayed to his Father that they might be with yourselves; if you are truly good, forgiven. Luke xxiii. 34. To this may acknowledge the goodness of my works; be added, that in this chapter, ver. if you persist in ascribing this work to 33-40, those Pharisees who had blas- Satan, acknowledge yourselves to be phemed against the Holy Ghost asked evil; for your conduct clearly proves the for a sign, and our Saviour gave one to fact. Others, again, understand it as them, viz., the sign of the prophet having a double reference, and equally Jonas; and what could this sign have applicable in either case :-"Either conbeen given for, unless for their convic-fess that I am good because ye see me tion, and for disposing them to repent, cast out devils and do good, or else conand, in consequence of this, to be for- vince me of any evil action before ye pregiven? From all which, it may (I judicate my person; or, either bring forth

the tree corrupt, and his fruit corrupt for the tree is known by his fruit.

34 O generation of vipers, how can ye, being evil, speak good things? for out of the abundance of the heart, the mouth speaketh. good fruits, that ye may appear to be good, or else confess yourselves to be evil, as indeed you are; be what you seem, or seem what you are."-Assembly's Annot. The verse may admit of either of these interpretations; but, in my judgment, the second or third is preferable to the first.

34. Generation of vipers. See note on Matt. iii. 7. An emblem of their malicious and venomous opposition to Jesus and his gospel. How can ye, being evil, speak good things? &c. That is, while you are thus wicked, and full of evil, it is natural that you should speak evil; it is impossible that it should be otherwise; for when the heart is full, the language will disclose the character of its feelings and affections. The expression used by our Lord was strong; but the conduct of the Pharisees fully justified it. So envenomed was their malice against him, that they spake evil of his good; they watched him, that they might be able to accuse him even for the performance of deeds of mercy and kindness; when they witnessed his healing power exerted for the relief of human misery, even that they attributed to the prince of evil; and they persisted in their evil thoughts and designs, until they procured the object of their hatred to be crucified between two thieves. See also Matt. ch. xxiii. Most justly, then, were they described, as a generation of vipers. And as thorns will not produce grapes, nor a vine figs, neither could good works or good words be expected of them. Their hearts were abundantly full of evil; and from that abundance they uttered falsehood and blasphemy with their mouths.

35. A good man, &c. In this verse, the sentiment contained in the former, out of the abundance of the heart the mouth speaketh, is amplified and further illustrated. A good man, whose heart abounds in goodness, speaketh good things; words and thoughts are uttered, consistent with a spirit of righteousness. An evil man, whose

35 A good man, out of the good treasure of the heart, bringeth forth good things: and an evil man, out of the evil treasure, bringeth forth evil things.

36 But I say unto you, That every idle word that men shall heart abounds with wickedness, speaketh evil things; words and thoughts are uttered, corresponding with the state of his heart. This was a most severe rebuke to those Pharisees, who so highly esteemed themselves that they would not associate with publicans and sinners, and condemned our Lord because he did. He told them they had blasphemed against the holy spirit; and that such blasphemy plainly indicated the impurity of their hearts; and manifested them as a generation of vipers.

36. But I say unto you. Think not that because you obey the ceremonial law, in every jot and tittle, you may therefore speak all manner of evil, and even revile the holy spirit of God, with impunity. I say unto you, there are other things for which men shall be brought into judgment, besides matters of ceremony, or even deeds of whatever nature. Words indicate the condition of the heart, and of them also an account must be rendered. Idle word. The word idle seems here to be used not in its ordinary sense, but in the sense of wicked, calumnious, or blasphemous; for such words had been uttered by the Pharisees, which gave occasion for the foregoing solemn admonition. It signifies" that which does not work, and is here used for that which worketh wickedly; and something of this sort is frequently found in sacred and profane writers. So in Rom. iv., he who is said, in ver. 19, to be not weak in the faith, is, in ver. 20, said to be strong in the faith. So in Prov. xviii. 5, and xxiv. 23, where we read it is not good, the meaning is, that it is very bad."-Pearce. the day of judgment. Rather a day of judgment; the article is not found in the original. The meaning is, that wicked words, being the fruit of a wicked heart, are justly punishable; that as every man shall be rewarded according to his deeds, so also according to his words. Both words and deeds are proper subjects to be con

TIn

speak, they shall give account thereof in the day of judgment.

37 For by thy words thou shalt be justified, and by thy words thou shalt be condemned.

38 Then certain of the scribes sidered, as both take their character from the condition of the heart, and afford evidence of that condition. Indeed, words are sometimes productive of extensive mischief and misery, and are punishable by human laws. But it is not probable that our Lord referred to this fact in the text. He seems rather to have confined his attention to the case then in hand, and to have endeavored to convince the Jews that they had committed a grievous sin, by blasphemous words, for which a day of reckoning was approaching. Lightfoot views the matter somewhat differently. He says, the "idle word, for every one of which our Saviour saith men shall give an account, (he doth not say shall be condemned or punished,) may perhaps be of the same importance with that which the Talmudists and Rabbins call' the talk of those who are idle,' at leisure, have little to do; such as is used among people in ordinary conversation, when they meet together; as, what news? how doth such a person? or the like. Even this may be well or ill done, prudently or foolishly; and therefore even of this an account will be required."

and of the Pharisees answered, saying, Master, we would see a sign from thee.

[ocr errors]

39 But he answered and said to them, An evil and adulterous generation seeketh after a sign, and teacher. We would see a sign from thee. Luke says, " a sign from heaven." Luke xi. 16. They had already, even during this interview, seen Jesus restore a withered hand to soundness, and heal a disease which they supposed to be occasioned by demons. Yet they continued to ask for a sign. Probably they demanded a sign from heaven, such as the ancient prophets exhibited; as when, at the word of Moses, hail and fire were rained upon Egypt, destroying both herb and tree Exo. ix. 22-25; or, at the word of Joshua, the sun "stood still in the midst of heaven, and hasted not to go down about a whole day;" Josh. x. 12-14; or, at the word of Elijah, fire descended from heaven and consumed not only the burnt-sacrifice, but the wood, and stones of the altar, and the water in the trench around 1 Kings xviii. 36-38. Some similar sign was demanded on this occasion, as a condition of belief. Perhaps they claimed this as a fulfilment of the prediction, Dan. vii. 13, that the Son of man should come in the clouds of heaven. This he did, at a later period, when he came to execute judgment upon that wicked nation. Matt. xxiv. 30; xxvi. 64. But his time had not yet come, to exhibit this sign. The expectation of such a marvellous sign in testimony of the Messiah's authority is alluded to in Matt. iv. 5-7. See the notes there.

37. For by thy words, &c. Of course, not by words alone; but by words as well as by deeds; because both are the fruit of good or evil in the heart. In this verse, the principle is declared, upon which the foregoing admonition was founded. In the government of God, words as well as deeds are to be taken as evidence of 39. Evil and adulterous generation. character, and as a ground of acquittal That the Jews were an evil generation, or condemnation. Blasphemous words there can be no doubt. That they were indicated the most desperately wicked literally an adulterous generation, has condition of the heart, and were not also been asserted. But perhaps this only punishable, but ominous of long-term may be here used in its figurative continued unbelief, during the existence of which, forgiveness could not be realized.

38-42. The same circumstances are related in Luke xi. 16, 29-32.

38. Master. Teacher; an epithet here applied rather in derision than in honor; because they regarded him as an impostor, aided by Beelzebub, and not entitled to credit as a divine

sense, denoting infidelity to religious duties. In the Old Testament, the Jews are frequently represented as guilty of adultery, when they forsook the worship of God, and bowed themselves to idols. Exo. xxxiv. 15, 16; Jer. iii. 9; Ezek. xxiii. 37; Hosea iv. 12-19. Although the Jews were not in habits of idolatry, in its ordinary sense, yet they practised a species of it,

there shall no sign be given to it, but the sign of the prophet Jonas.

40 For as Jonas was three days and three nights in the whale's

in our Saviour's day. They made the divine law void by their traditions; and, by an overweening fondness for trivial matters, were induced to neglect the important duties required of them. Matt. xv. 3; xxiii. 23. And when the Son came, exhibiting abundant testimonials of his divine mission, they rejected him, and made full proof of their infidelity. Being thus apostate to the truth, and unfaithful to their duty, they are styled adulterous, as were those who forsook God, disobeyed his commands, and worshipped stocks and stones, in ancient times. No sign be given to it. That is, no other sign than the miracles performed by divine power, with the exception which follows. If they would not regard these signs, they must abide the consequences. But the sign of the prophet Jonas. That is, Jonah. A sign should be given to the Jews, similar to that which was given to the Ninevites, and which was effectual to the production of repentance in them. Jonah was preserved for three days and nights, in the most imminent peril. His preservation was regarded as an evidence of his mission from God. And the Ninevites gave heed to his warnings, and averted the impending ruin by a speedy reformation of their evil habits. In like manner would Jesus be restored, after three days, from an apparently more desperate condition; and this should be considered a sufficient sign that he was truly the Son of God. If men would not believe, they would be more guilty than the people of Nineveh, and would be condemned by them in the judg

ment.

40. As Jonas was three days and three nights in the whale's belly. See Jonah ch. i., ii. The preservation of Jonah, here referred to, has long been the jest of scoffers and unbelievers. Perhaps this fact may account for the various methods which interpreters have adopted, so to explain the matter as to render it as little objectionable as possible. In reply to the objection that the throat of a whale is not large enough to admit the passage of a man through it, it has been said that the

belly: so shall the Son of man be three days and three nights in the heart of the earth.

41 The men of Nineveh shall

word translated whale means a large fish, without distinguishing the species; and therefore it may have been a shark. And, to obviate the objection in general, that the whole process of preservation is impossible, has been said, that the word simply indicates something hollow, and may as well mean a boat or a small vessel as a fish of any description. This is not the place for a full examination of this subject. A few remarks, however, may not be improper. The theory of Dr. Jebb is ingenious, and is worthy of consideration. "A safe and practicable asylum is afforded, not indeed in the stomach, but in another cavity, of the whale; the throat is large, and provided with a bag or intestine, so considerable in size, that whales frequently take into it two of their young when weak, and especially during a tempest. In this vessel there are two vents, which serve for inspiration and respiration; and here, in all probability, Jonah was preserved; not indeed without miracle, but with that economy of miracle, so frequently exemplified in Scripture. This receptacle may be accounted a sort of air-vessel, and sufficiently answers to the term koilia, (zola,) in St. Matthew, which I have rendered cavity. See, for the particulars here stated in abridged form, a very ingenious dissertation in the Memoires des Jesuites, publies par M. l'Abbe Grosier;' tome i., art. 9. Of the above opinion, a strong, undesigned, and independent, confirmation is afforded by an eminent naturalist: 'Nature has formed these organized masses in such a manner, that they can rise to the surface of the water, or sink into its depths, at pleasure. From the lower part of the mouth proceeds a large intestine, very thick, long, and so large that a man might pass into it whole. This intestine is a great airmagazine, which this cetacious animal carries along with it, and by means of which it can render itself lighter or heavier at will, according as it enlarges or compresses it, for the purpose of increasing or diminishing the bulk of air which it contains.' Dict. Nat. Hist., by

rise in judgment with this genera-ing of Jonas; and behold, a greattion, and shall condemn it: be-er than Jonas is here. cause they repented at the preach

42 The queen of the south shall

cerning the law of circumcision, Lev. xii. 3, in this manner: 'If the infant was born but one hour before the first day was ended, it was counted for one whole day; and so, for the same reason, the part of the day that was past, when the infant was circumcised, was reckoned a whole day, if it was only one hour, that was past, of the evening with which that eighth day began." So our Lord remained in the sepulchre three days; namely, one whole day, and two parts of days, which, as the Jews reckoned time, were to be taken as one day each. He was buried towards the close of Friday, remained in the tomb the whole of Saturday, and was raised early on Sunday, as the days are now called by Christians. See Matt. xxvii. 57-66; xxvii. 1-3. The Jews never alleged that this prediction was not fulfilled, in respect to time. We may therefore conclude that the phrase three days and three nights expressed the time during which Jesus actually remained in the sepulchre, according to their manner of speech.

Valmont Bomare, Art. Whale. This, it will be observed, is the testimony of a writer who had not the case of Jonah at all in view; who wrote merely as a naturalist; and who could, therefore, have given no such coloring to his description, as the Jesuite might, perhaps, be suspected of giving." Sac. Literature, p. 178. See Univ. Union, vol. i., pp. 68, 69; Horne's Intro., i., 597. I only add, that, in whatever manner we account for the circumstances, we have the authority of our Lord for denominating the fact a sign or miracle. And why should it be thought a thing incredible, that the same God who gave life to Jonah should preserve that life, in an extraordinary manner, by means of a fish or otherwise? The fact that unusual means were used for the accomplishment of the object does not impair the credibility of the miracle. Indeed, this holds true of all miracles; otherwise they would attract no attention, and would fail of their intended effect. Had our Lord cured diseases, by administering the usual medicines, he might have been regarded as a skilful physician; but it was by unusual methods of cure,-healing by a touch, or word, or an effort of his will,-that 41. Nineveh. This city, "the capital he exhibited evidence that God was of Assyria, was founded by Ashur, son with him. I see nothing in this mira- of Shem; or more probably by Nimrod, cle, less probable, or less entitled to son of Cush; for, in Gen. x. 11, Moses belief, than in any other. And, in my seems to refer to Nimrod. However judgment, every miracle recorded in the this may be, Nineveh was one of the Scriptures might be rejected on pre- most ancient, famous, potent, and excisely the same principles which would tensive, cities of the world. It is justify a rejection of this. Infidels may very difficult to assign the time of its sneer and scoff; but Christians will foundation; but it cannot have been reverence the power of God, displayed long after the building of Babel. It for the production of good. T The Son stood on the banks of the Tigris; and of man. A title of the Messiah, which in the time of the prophet Jonah its cirJesus frequently adopted when speak-cuit was three days' journey. Diodorus ing of himself. ¶ Three days and three Siculus says, it was one hundred and nights. That is, according to the Jew-fifty stadia in length, ninety stadia in ish manner of computation. Having no one word to express a day of twenty-four hours, they adopted the phrase day and night to express this idea. The language of the text indicates simply three days, as they would now be called. But in reckoning days, a part was taken for the whole. AbenEzra, quoted by Pearce, speaks con

Heart of the earth. A phrase denoting the interior of the earth. It means, here, the sepulchre, or tomb, in which the body of Jesus rested.

breadth, and four hundred and eighty stadia in circuit; that is, about seven leagues long, three leagues broad, and eighteen leagues round. Its walls were a hundred feet high, and so broad that three chariots could drive abreast upon them. Its towers, of which there were fifteen hundred, were each two hundred feet high. Some place it on the west,

« ΠροηγούμενηΣυνέχεια »