Macadamizing Macadamiz DESCRIPTION in Square. Feet Cement Curbing ing in lineal feet Cost Dollars Cts. Dollars Cts. Dollars Cts. Dollars, Cts. Frontage Term'n Opp. Term Cross'g Dollars Number of Front Feet Assessed Number of Feet Assessed Rate per front foot Assessed Cents 1676.64 2.50.478 42.0786 22.311826 Totals, 33,668.5 743.37 4,713 59 297 35 260 50 5,271 44 Dollars Cts. Dollars, Cts. Dollars, Cts. Dollars! Cts. Dollars Cts 317 61 60 11 62 62 317 61 60 11 6:2 62 PAYMENTS Done at said City of Los Angeles, this 28th day of October, 1891, DRURY A. WATSON, Street Superintendent of the City of Los Angeles The above is a diagram exhibiting Washington street in the city and county of San Francisco, state of California, and its intersecting streets, from the west curb line of Jones street to the east curb line of Leavenworth street, on which work has been done under my official contract, dated the 27th day of October, 1888, and executed by me as superintendent of streets of said city, and county, with the Pacific Paving Company, a corporation, for paving said Washington street from said line of Jones street to said line of Leavenworth street, as will more fully appear from said contract, to which reference is hereby made for further particulars. Said diagram shows the relative location of each district, lot, portion of lot and parcel of land assessed, to the work done; is numbered to correspond with the numbers in the assessment attached hereto, said numbers being in red; and shows the number of feet fronting assessed for said work contracted for and performed. The figures in the diagram in black ink, represent feet and fractions of feet. Those next to property lines show, each, the length of said lines in feet. The figures in red ink show the numbers of the lots. In witness whereof, I have hereto set my hand at said city and county of San Francisco, this 16th day of January, 1889. THOMAS ASHWORTH, Superintendent of streets of the city and county of San Francisco. Recorded this 16th day of January, 1889. THOMAS ASHWORTH, Superintendent of streets of the city and county of San Francisco. [NOTE: If any abbreviations are used, such as "No.," "ft.," "in.," etc., their meaning should be stated. Thus, it may be proper to insert something like the following: Herein, "No." is used for the word "number;" "ft." for the word "feet;" "in." for the word "inches." The marks ' and '' means respectively "feet" and "inches."] By virture hereof, I, Drury A, Watson, superintendent of streets, of the city of Los Angeles, county of Los Angel's, and state of California, by virtue of the authority vested in me as said superintendent of streets, do authorize and empower the Porphyry Paving Company, its agents or assigns, to demand and receive the several assessments upon the assessment and diagram hereto attached, and this shall be its warrant for the same. Dated at Los Angeles, this 28th day of October, 1891. DRURY A. WATSON, Superintendent of streets of the city of Los Angeles. Countersigned by: T. E. ROWAN, Mayor of the city of Los Angeles. Recorded this 28th day of October, 1891. DRURY A. WATSON, Superintendent of streets of the city of Los Angeles. No. 14. CONTRACTOR'S RETURN. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, County of Los Angeles, SS. City of Los Angeles. H. A. Palmer being duly sworn, says that he is the secretary of the Por phyry Paring Co., contractor named in the annexed assessment, diagram and warrant; that said assessment for the total cost of certain street work upon Requena street between Los Angeles and Alameda streets in said city, as more fully described therein, and in the contract for said work with said Porphyry Paring Company made by the superintendent of streets of said city, dated the 21st day of July, A. D. 1891, levied as therein described upon certain lots, portions of lots, or parcels of land, and the unknown owners thereof for the sum of five thousand two hundred and seventy-one and 44-100 dollars, ($5271.44-100), payable to Porphyry Paving Company, its agents or assigns, was made, and with the city engineer's certificate of said work, was recorded and delivered by said superintendent of streets on the 28th day of October, 1891, to affiant in behalf of said contractor; that there were attached to the same and delivered to the same in the same behalf at the same time by the said superintendent of streets, his diagram hereto attached, and a warrant in favor of Porphyry Paring Company for collecting said assessment, upon which warrant this return is endorsed; that in the case of all assessments therein described, but not included in the following table, affiant has, since the date last aforesaid, in the manner hereinafter described and in behalf of said contractor, made demand upon and received full payment from the owners of each and all such assessed lots and lands; and that besides all personal demands, affiant did, whereever the name of the owner of the lot is stated as "unknown" on the assessment, on the 27th day of November, A. D. 1891, within thirty days from the date of said warrant, and between the hours of 9 A. M. and 5 P. M., in behalf of said contractor enter upon each of the corresponding lots. portion of lots, and parcels of land assessed, and with said certificate, assessment, diagram and warrant, and in a loud, audible voice, publicly make separate demands for the payment of each of said assessments from the unknown owners thereof, upon each lot, portion of lot, or parcel of land, for each of its own assessments as specified in said assessment; and that wherever he found a building, tenant or occupant upon any of said premises, besides the public demands as aforesaid, he, at the same time, in the same behalf, presenting and exhibiting said certificate, assessment, diagram and warrant in each instance, demanded from each tenant, or occupant, for the unknown owners, separately, the payment of each of said assessments upon said premises; and in the following table he states the name of such demandee, as "tenant" or "occupant," with the word "unknown;" but that, notwithstanding said demands, the following totals of said assessed sums, each separately demanded, and also the total, remain unpaid, to wit: Subscribed and sworn to before me this 27th day of November, 1891. FRED. HARKNESS, Notary Public. Filed this 27th day of November, 1891, Recorded this 27th day of November, 1891, D. A. WATSON, Superintendent of streets of the city of Los Angeles. D. A. WATSON, Superintendent of streets of the city of Los Angeles. I hereby complete and sign the foregoing record, from page 34 to page 44, both inclusive, of the assessment, diagram, warrant, certificate of the city engineer, contractor's return; and also in the book of "contracts and bonds," the recorded contract and bond, each numbered No. 1000, all for the work therein described upon Requena street, from the east line of Los Angeles street, to the west line of Alameda street, in the city of Los Angeles, state of California. Office of the superintendent of streets of the city of Los Angeles, state of California, this 27th day of November, 1891. D. A. WATSON, Superintendent of streets of the city of Los Angeles. NOTE: The assessment, diagram, warrant and certificate of the city engineer must be recorded by the superintendent of streets before delivery to the contractor, and, to constitute a record, the record thereof must be authenticated by the signature of the street superintendent. See section 9 and the notes thereto. No. 16. COMPLAINT TO FORECLOSE A STREET ASSESSMENT LIEN. [TITLE OF COURT AND CAUSE.] The plaintiff complains and alleges: I. That the defendant is, and at all the times herein mentioned was, the owner of the following described property, fronting on the city of Los Angeles, county of Los Angeles, the more particularly described as follows, to wit: street, in state of California, between line of street, and [Here insert description of the property sought to be charged with the assessment lien.] |