...these shifts. About 25 men were employed at No. 1 shaft at the time. At the conclusion of the testimony the defendant moved the court to direct a verdict in its favor, on the grounds that the plaintiff had failed to prove any negligence of defendant; that the risk, if there...

...interest from date of payment. Defendant's most important assignment of error is directed to refusal of the court to direct a verdict in its favor "on the ground that plaintiff was not entitled to have deducted from its property, for the purpose of taxation, any amount...

...years ago. I never treated her for gonorrhea." The foregoing constitutes all the evidence in the case. The defendant moved the court to direct a verdict in its favor, for the reason that the injury alleged was a disease, and not an accident, that the plaintiff had failed...

...there was no evidence of gross negligence of the defendant. At the close of the plaintiff's evidence, the defendant moved the court to direct a verdict in its favor for many reasons, among them being that plaintiff's undisputed evidence conclusively showed that he,...

...it charges the switch was broken and out of repair. At the conclusion of all the evidence appellant moved the court to direct a verdict in its favor, on the ground there was no proof tending to show appellee was ordered or directed to take the car to the place where...

...a plea of the general issue was filed. There was a jury trial, and at the close of all the evidence the defendant moved the court to direct a verdict in its favor. The court denied the motion and the defendant excepted. The plaintiff then moved the court to direct...

...personal injury. A jury was empanneled to try the issues, and the plaintiff having submitted his case, defendant moved the court to direct a verdict in its favor on the ground that there was neither averment or proof of an actionable wrong. The motion was sustained, but before the...

...recover. The plaintiffs below did not introduce any written contract, and when their case was rested the defendant moved the court to direct a verdict in its favor, which the court declined to do. In this we think no error was committed. It must be remembered, that...

...alleged contributory neg'ligence on the part of Copley, and, when plaintiffs rested their case in chief, moved the court to direct a verdict in its favor on the ground that the deceased was guilty of contributory negligence in attempting to pass between the cars on the side...

[ Λυπούμαστε, το περιεχόμενο αυτής της σελίδας είναι περιορισμένο ]