Addenda and Corrigenda.

"As the decision.

cxliv

Page 275, lines 15-19. For paragraph, O. lix. r. 1 (e)," substitute the following, "The jurisdiction of the judge or Court to interfere, by order, with the rule of costs of an action tried with a jury, only arises where there is 'good cause;' an appeal therefore lies from such order to the C. A. Jones v. Curling, 53 L. J., Q. B. D. 373, C. A.”

275, line 14, from bottom.

Add, "See also Pearson v. Ripley, 50 L. T. 629, Q. B. D.; Waring v. Pearman, Id. 633."

275, line 26.

Add, "See also Goutard v. Carr, 53 L. J., Q. B. D. 55, C.A.” 275, line 3 from bottom.

Add, "The assessment of damages by a jury where judgment has been signed against the defendant by default, is not within the proviso, and the costs do not follow the event. Gath v. Howarth, W. N. 1884, p. 99,

Field, J."

276, line 26.

Add, "The liability of C. to costs is not affected by the County Courts Act, 1867, s. 5, infra. Bates v. Burchell, W. N. 1884, p. 108, Field, J." 276, line 7 from bottom.

Add, "So where an application for judgment was made under O. xiv., and the jury have negatived the defence set up by the defendant, on which he obtained leave to defend. Copley v. Jackson, W. N. 1884, p. 94, Field, J."

278, line 19.

Add, "Sect. 5 does not apply to third party costs. Bates v. Burchell, W. N., 1884, p. 108, Field, J.

282, line 7.

Add, "Ex pte. Theys, 25 Ch. D. 587, C. A.; Walker v. Bradford Old Bank, 12 Q. B. D. 511,"

296, line 18 from bottom.

Dele "D."

299, line 6.

Add, "See also Heywood v. Mallalicu, 25 Ch. D. 357." 300, line 3 from bottom.

Add, "Palmer v. Johnson, was affirmed in C. A., 53 L. J., Q. B. D. 348, overruling Manson v. Thacker, Besley v. Besley, Allen v. Richardson, and the judgment of Williams, J., in Joliffe v. Baker, cited pp. 300, 301." 301, line 22.

Add, "See further Howe v. Smith, 50 L. T., 573, C. A."

305, line 9.

Add, "One joint tenant, or tenant in common, can demise his interest at a rent, to another joint tenant, or tenant in common. Cowper v. Fletcher, Leigh v. Dickeson, cited post, p. 987."

316, line 22.

Add, "As to liability of tenant in common of a house, to contribute to expense of repairs done by his co-tenant, see Leigh v. Dickeson, 12 Q. B. D. 194, cited post, p. 532."

329, line 7.

Add, "The Bank Holidays Act, 1871, 34 & 35 Vict. c 17, s. 1, appoints as bank holidays Easter Monday, Whitsun Monday, the first Monday in August, and December 26th, if a week day. If it be a Sunday, then the holiday is December 27th; 38 & 39 Vict. c. 13, s. 2. By 34 & 35 Vict. c. 17, s. 5, these days may in any year be altered by Order in Council; and Her Majesty may by proclamation appoint other days to be kept as bank holidays (sect. 4)."

VOL. I.

k

Page 335, line 17.

To" Carter v. White," add reference, "25 Ch. D. 666." 348, line 13.

Add, "See sect. 49 (13), infra, as to notice by an agent in whose hands a bill of exchange is dishonoured."

349, line 20.

Add, "As to what are holidays under the Bank Holidays Acts, vide Add. 329."

To" McLean v. Clydesdale Banking Co.," add reference, “9 Ap. Ca. 95."

382, line 28.

Add, "Stock v. Inglis, was reversed in C. A., 12 Q. B. D. 564.” 411, line 17 from bottom.

Add, "Accord. City Bank v. Sovereign Life Assur. Co., 50 L. T. 565, Ch. D."

416, line 11 from bottom.

Add, "Burdick v. Sewell, was reversed in C. A., and is reported, 13 Q. B. D. 159."

420, line 6 from bottom.

Add, "Coverdale v. Grant, was affirmed in D. P. and is noted, W. N., 1884, p. 79."

426, line 5 from bottom.

To "Tattersall v. National S. Ship Co.," add reference, "12 Q. B. D. 297."

427, line 8 from bottom.

Add, "Tattersall v. National S. Ship Co., 12 Q. B. D. 297."

428, line 14 from bottom.

To "Gullischen v. Stewart,” add reference, “53 L. J., Q. B. D. 173, C. A."

435, line 3 from bottom.

Add, "See also Carter v. White, 25 Ch. D. 666, C. A.”

443, line 17 from bottom.

Add, "W. London Commercial Bank v. Kitson, was affirmed in C. A., and is reported, 53 L. J., Q. B. D. 345.”

454, line 27. Add, "

489, line 3.

Ingle v. McCutchan, 12 Q. B. D. 518."

Add, Mersey Steel & Iron Co. v. Naylor, was affirmed in D. P., and is noted, W. N., 1884, p. 97."

530, line 9.

Add, "Read v. Anderson, was affirmed in C. A. (diss. Brett, M. R.), and is noted, W. N., 1884, p. 140."

530, line 22.

For 512," read, “518."

538, line 30.

To "In re Cape Breton Co.," add reference, "26 Ch. D. 221." 552, line 23.

To" Burlinson v. Hall," add reference, "12 Q. B. D. 347." 578, line 6 from bottom.

66

Add, The Notting Hill, 9 P. D. 105, C. A.”