Εικόνες σελίδας
PDF
Ηλεκτρ. έκδοση

same thing under one name, which they would abominate and detest under another. The name of king was to the old Romans odious and insufferable; but in Sylla and Julius Cæsar they could endure the power and absoluteness of a king, disguised under the name of dictator.-South, 1633-1716.

I think that one of the master incantations, one of the most signal deceits, which we practise upon ourselves, comes from the use of language. There are words that we learn in childhood which we abandon when we come to manhood. Generally speaking, our fireside words are old Saxon words-short, knotty, tough, and imbued with moral and affectional meanings; but as we grow older these words are too rude and plain for our use, and so we get Latin terms and periphrases by which to express many of our thoughts. When we talk about ourselves we almost invariably use Latin words, and when we talk about our neighbours we use Saxon words. And one of

If a

the best things a man can do, I think, is to
examine himself in the Saxon tongue.
man tells that which is contrary to truth, let
him not say, "I equivocate;
let him say
"I lie." Lie! why, it brings the judgment-
day right home to a man's thought. Men do
not like it, but it is exactly the thing that
will most effectually touch the moral sense;
and the more the moral sense is touched the
better. If a man has departed from rectitude
in his dealings with another, let him not say
"I took advantage," which is a roundabout,
long sentence: let him say, "I cheated." That
is a very direct word. It springs straight to
the conscience, as the arrow flies from the
bow to the centre of the mark. Does it grate
harshly on your ear? Nevertheless, it is
better that you should employ it; and you
should come to this determination: "I will
call things that I detect in my conduct by
those clear-faced, rough-tongued words that
my enemies use if they wanted to sting me
to the quick."-Beecher.

THE SIN OF Confounding GOOD AND EVIL. v. 20. Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil. The conscience of every man testifies that there is an unchangeable difference between good and evil; but each man is prone to think his own vice little or no sin at all. He substitutes other names for his crime, and calls his evil good. I. Many are selfdeceived (Prov. xiv. 12). How many think themselves religious, merely because they pay some or much respect to the outward ordinances of religion, while there is no change in their character. How many justify their irreligion, by depicting religion

as morose and gloomy. How many commit crimes without one misgiving of conscience, merely because they are varnished over by specious names. How often under the pretence of promoting the honour of true religion, massacres and murders have been sanctified; the torch of persecution brandished round, and the flame of civil discord raised, to light the path to heaven! II. Many endeavour to deceive others, by false representations of sin and duty (Luke xvii. 1, 2).—George Mathew, M.A., Sermons, ii. 101-118.

ON THE PERVERSION OF RIGHT AND WRong. v. 20. Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil. There is in many a wonderful propensity to perplex the distinctions between right and wrong, and to obscure the boundaries of virtue and vice. Their propensity is both absurd and wicked. It most frequently manifests itself in two ways:-1. By bestowing soft and gentle names on crimes of real and destructive magnitude. Thus, infidelity and scepticism have been called "free inquiry," indifference to all religion "à spirit of toleration," duelling "an honourable deed," adultery "gallantry," extravagance "a liberal

a

[ocr errors]

expenditure," the selfish sensualist " good-natured man." By the use of such false and misleading terms, we lower the standard of right and wrong, and expose ourselves to the temptation of practising what we have persuaded ourselves is not so very wrong. 2. By applauding works of genius and imagination of which the real tendency is to inflame the passions, and to weaken moral and religious principle. The tendency of such works should lead us unhesitatingly to condemn and reject them, whatever may be the

literary fascinations of their style. Nothing is more dangerous than a book which imparts to vice the delusive appearance of a virtue. Thus, to confound the distinctions between right and wrong, is to renounce the

superiority which man claims over the brute creation that of being a rational creature, for the brutes are never guilty of anything so irrational as that of calling good evil, and evil good.-Charles Moore, M.A., Sermons, ii. pp. 155-172.

THE SIN OF USING WRONG NAMES. v. 20. Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil. What difference can it make what anything is called?

"What's in a name?

A rose by any other name would smell as sweet."

Yet the Bible pronounces its woe upon those who merely call things by wrong names. Why?

The

1. Names are not mere words: they are the representatives of ideas; and hence, they have a force of meaning which makes them powerful instruments. There are opprobrious epithets that wound more severely than a blow. Slander has slain more than the dagger. name of a place or person suggests to us all that we know, or have conceived, about it or him. Paul, Jesus-what a power there is in these names! How suggestive are the phrases, " an upright man," a transparent character! Because words are representatives of ideas, to use wrong names is to convey false ideas. 2. The wrong use of names confounds moral distinctions, and

[ocr errors]

perplexes and misleads men in regard to
duty. Right must not be called wrong,
or wrong right. This is to sweep
away all the landmarks of duty; or,
rather, it is shifting all the buoys and
beacons by which we navigate the sea
of life, so that instead of warning us
of danger, they shall rather draw us
upon shoals and rocks. The skill of
every successful errorist consists in a
dexterous jugglery of names. 3. By
giving decent names to gross sins, the
standard of public morals is lowered, and
the community is corrupted. One of the
things that blinded America to the
evil of slavery was, the term that used
to be applied to it-"our domestic
institution," &c. Be on your guard,
then, against wrong names.
Do not
try to deceive yourself by means of
them. Pure covetousness is sin, even
though you do call it economy, &c.
Do not try to deceive others (Matt. v.
19; Mark ix. 42).-S. G. Buckingham,
American National Preacher, xxxv.
269-278.

SELF-CONCEIT.

v. 21. Woe unto them that are wise in their own eyes, and prudent in their own sight.

Self-conceit. I. Its signs: dogmatism; contempt of others; scepticism, II. Its causes: ignorance (a); vanity. III. Its folly: it makes a man ridiculous; leads him into error. IV. Its offensiveness to God; in spirit-principle-action. V. Its certain humiliation.-J. Lyth, D.D.

(a) The truest characters of ignorance

Are vanity, and pride, and arrogance ;
As blind men use to bear their noses higher
Than those that have their eyes and sight
entire.
-Butler.

By ignorance is pride increased;
Those most assume who know the least:
Their own self-balance gives them weight,
But every other finds them light.-Gay.

INTELLECTUAL PRIDE.

v. 21. Woe unto them that are wise in their own eyes, and prudent in their own sight. Woe to the intellectually proud. I. in judgment upon the Word of God, To the self-conceited sceptic, who sits and condemns it (a). II. To the self

[merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small]

v. 22. Woe unto them that are mighty to drink wine, and men of strength to mingle strong drink.

1. Good

There are certain vices which the customs of certain countries seem to place only in the number of human infirmities; and yet, if we look at their effects, we shall see that really they are as black as those sins which God and man visits with the severest punishments. I. The Drunkard's excuses, by which he endeavours to defend or palliate his crime. fellowship. But can friendship be founded on vice? especially on a vice which notoriously impairs the memory and the sense of obligation, leads to the betrayal of secrets, and stirs up strife and contention? Instead of promoting conversation it destroys it by destroying the very capability of communicating rational and agreeable thoughts. The drunkard may make his company merry, but they laugh at, not with, him, and merely because they are delighted with the sight of one even sillier than themselves. 2. "It drowns care." But the drunkard's care must arise either from his ill state of health, the unfortunate posture of his worldly affairs, or the stings of his guilty conscience; and, in either case, his temporary oblivion is purchased at the cost of an aggravation of the evils which cause him to desire it. To drink to drown remorse is especially absurd, for all that the drunkard can expect from this course is the benefit of travelling some part

3.

of the road to eternal misery with his eyes covered. 3. The drunkard has other excuses: he says that he is so exposed to company and business, that he cannot avoid drinking to excess, or that he is of so easy and flexible a temper, that he cannot resist the importunities of his friends, as he calls them. Thus he is for softening his vice. into a sort of virtue, and calling that good nature, which his creditor calls villany, and his family cruelty. II. The drunkard's woe. This is made up of the miserable effects, as well temporal as spiritual, of his favourite vice. 1. Poverty. 2. Contempt. Ill-health. 4. An untimely death. Consider, too, the spiritual evils that spring from and punish the vice of drunkenness. 1. The understanding is depraved and darkened. 2. The will is enfeebled and dethroned. The passions are inflamed and rendered ungovernable. 4. Regard for men and reverence for God are destroyed. Drunkenness travels with a whole train of other vices, and requires the whole width of the broad way to give it room. Where its journey is to end, we know; so that if the guilt and misery which attend it here, be not enough, there, at least, the drunkard, having opened his eyes and recovered the use of his reason, will perceive the truth of the text.-Skelton, in Clapham's Selected Sermons, ii, 384–392.

3.

THE WOE OF THE DRUNKARD.

v. 22. Woe unto them that are mighty to drink wine, and men of strength to mingle strong drink.

Woe to the drunkard. I. To his reputation (a). II. To his interests. III. To his health. IV. To his family. V. To his soul (8).-J. Lyth, D.D.

(a) Some of you glory in your shame, that you have drunk down your companions, and carried it away,-the honour of a sponge or a tub, which can drink up or hold liquor as well as you.-Baxter, 1615-1691.

(8) We commend wine for the excellency of it; but if it could speak, as it can take away speech, it would complain, that by our abuse both the excellencies are lost; for the excellent man doth so spoil the excellent wine, until the excellent wine hath spoiled the excellent man. Oh, that a man should take pleasure in that which makes him no man; that he should let a thief in at his mouth to steal away his wit; that for a little throat-indulgence, he should kill in himself both the first Adam, his reason, and even the second Adam, his regeneration, and so commit two murders at once. -Adams, 1653.

How base a price dost thou set upon thy Saviour and salvation, that will not forbear so much as a cup of drink for them? The

smallness of the thing showeth the smallness of thy love to God, and the smallness of thy regard to His Word and to thy soul. Is that loving God as God, when thou lovest a cup of drink better? Art thou not ashamed of thy hypocrisy, when thou sayest thou lovest God above all, when thou lovest Him not so well as thy wine and ale? Surely he that loveth Him not above ale, loveth Him not above all! Thy choice showeth what thou lovest best, more certainly than thy tongue doth. It is the dish that a man greedily eateth of that he loveth, and not that which he commendeth but will not meddle with. God trieth men's love to Him, by their keeping His commandments. It was the aggravation of the first sin, that they would not deny so small a thing as the forbidden fruit, in obedience to God! And so it is of thine, that wilt not leave a forbidden cup for Him! O miserable wretch! dost thou not know thou canst not be Christ's disciple, if thou forsake not all for Him, and hate not even thy life in comparison of Him, and wouldst not rather die than forsake Him ! And art thou like to lay down thy life for Him that wilt not leave a cup of drink for Him Canst thou burn at a stake for Him, that canst not leave an alehouse, or vain company, or excess for Him? What a sentence of condemnation dost thou pass upon thyself! -Baxter, 1615-1691.

DRINK AND ITS WOES.

v. 22. Woe unto them that are mighty to drink wine, and men of strength to mingle strong drink.

Human depravity and iniquity have existed in all ages and countries. The vices flowing therefrom have been much the same-selfishness, pride, sensualism, oppression, drunkenness. Alcohol acting directly on the brain, the seat of the mind, tends not only to derange, but to enfeeble and pervert, and produces moral obliquity, moral infatuation, and intensified delusion. All sorts of deceits are the consequence. Observe-I. THE CHARACTERS INTRODUCED (ver. 22). Observe also verses 11 and 12. In the last verses there is reference to confirmed drunkards, daily, early, and late; the sensual debauchees -their ignorance, want of thought and reflection. In the text, notorious drinkers, bold, impudent wager-layers, boasters, &c., and those who have got

the victory over the usual drinks, and now make them stronger to meet the cravings of appetite and to keep up the excitement. Observe, this is the great peril of moderate drinking. It creates the appetite, it increases the appetite; last of all, it gives the appetite the control, and the man or woman becomes the slave and then the victim.

II. THE INFATUATION PORTRAYED -by 1. Giving false names to things (ver. 20). Call (1) evil good: drinks (poisons) are called beverages; evil things made by men are called God's good creatures. And so they. call (2) good evil; despise the really good and safe; pour contempt on water and safe fluids, and treat them as evil or worthless. How drinks have secured the most alluring titles-strong

cordials, dew, &c., generous. Not only false names, but 2. False qualities (ver. 20), "Bitter for sweet." Now intoxicating drinks are not sweet or palatable to the natural taste; they blister the mouth of children; do burn the delicate nerves of the stomach; the tongue and lips have to be trained, drilled, hardened. Observe, they call sweet bitter; things really so are treated as insipid. Ask the spirit drinker to take milk or tea, or water, and see how his poisoned taste revolts, &c.

Then there is presented to us-3. Infatuated results. Put darkness for light; men plead and say these drinks

(1) Brighten the intellect. How false ! See the bloated faces, the diseased eyes, the sensual expression, the stupid look, the stupor. The light is artificial, momentary, false-no better than the effects of certain gases or deadly stimulants, as opium, Indian hemp, &c. But they refer to men, to Burns, Pitt, Sheridan, and other drinking wits. But they were intellectually great in spite, &c. Look at Milton, Look at Milton, Sir Isaac Newton; look at the inspired prophets -the seraphic Isaiah, the writer of the text. (2) They who drink say their drinks lighten the heart, give social joyousness. Right; but is it not sensual, spurious, evanescent, ends in darkness? So they put light for darkness. The calm, equable sobriety of soul they called dulness, darkness. But this is real, abiding, and rational. So, both in name and quality, and in effects, they call "evil good," &c.

III. THE WOES DENOUNCED. 1. There is the woe of physical consequences. The seed and the harvest, the poisons and their effects, fire, deranged stomach, plague, diseased liver, excited heart, fevered brain, all tending to a host of maladies, shortened life, and an early grave. There is-2. Woe of a distracted mind. Reason beclouded; reflection, perception, all marred. The guiding star eclipsed, the light obscured with darkness. There is the-3. Woe of moral defects. The man is vitiated, made worse and worse; his affections, his desires, his conscience, his heart, the whole soul. There is-4. The woe of perverted powers. Gifts, talents, &c., all poisoned; influence deadly; the man a curse-a curse to all. 5. The woe of God's malediction. God's woe, His displeasure, His threatening, His curse; this is written in both volumes of the Scriptures-in frightful representation, in declared eternal condemnation.

APPLICATION.-Learn-1. The horrors associated with strong drink; 2. The advantages of absolute temperance; 3. The value of these associations; 4. The encouragement for labours-staying curses, bringing down blessings; 5. The necessity of im.nediate decision; 6. The solemn importance of earnest prayer for the Divine benediction; 7. Let us avoid exaggerated conclusions. This is not the only evil; temperance not the only good. To all we say, "One thing is needful;" "Except ye be converted," &c.-Jabez Burns, D.Ď., LL.D., Sketches of Temperance Sermons.

THE DOOM OF DESPISERS.

v. 24. Therefore as the fire devoureth the stubble, and the flame consumeth the chaff, so their root shall be as rottenness, and their blossom shall go up as dust because they have cast away the law of the Lord of hosts, and despised the word of the Holy One of Israel.

Shut God out of the heart, and this is what it comes to at last. In Jewish history, we have a commentary on the judgments announced in the text, written in fire and blood. We have here-I. God's merciful approaches to the soul. 1. God begins with law. In the present day there is a nervous dread of law, as if it were the offspring

of severity rather than of grace (a). But law checks, rectifies, and blesses in innumerable ways (Ps. xix. 7-11; cxix. 105, &c). 2. To His law, He adds His word; His "word" of persua sion, exhortation, promise, and especially the great "word" of the Gospel II. God's merciful approaches rejected. "They have cast away the law," &c.

« ΠροηγούμενηΣυνέχεια »