The Library of Richard Porson
Xlibris Corporation, 28 Δεκ 2010 - 591 σελίδες
In writing this book three questions chiefly interested me. What books and pamphlets did Richard Porson own? From whom did he acquire these materials? What has become of his holdings? Answering the first question was relatively easy. For over two hundred years students have known that, after his death, Porson’s library was divided into two unequal parts. The larger portion was sent to auction, the smaller part, together with Porson’s papers, was separately sold to Trinity College, Cambridge. To treat the problem I have examined all of the microfilm set of the Sotheby auction catalogues from 1783 to 1808, save when catalogues were not marked or the markings were too faint to decipher: notably Jan. 1, 1785; May 29, 1786; Jan. 22 and May 1, 1797; June 1788; Jan. 13, 1789; May 26, 1791; June 22, 1795; Jan. 1796; 1800; Nov. 14, 1803 through Dec. 3, 1804 (twenty-three catalogues); April 18 and May 29, 1805; April 14-30, May 19, June 5, July 2, 10, 15, 1806 . . . or when the microfilm is imperfect. Likewise, I have seen, in London, most of Christie’s book catalogues from 1782 to 1808; and, in Los Angeles, much of the Frank Marcham collection at UCLA (coll. 416 boxes 10-34). Finally, I have seen almost all of Porson’s books at Trinity and a few other places. From 1786 to 1808, Porson purchased hundreds of books and pamphlets. The records allow us to trace his purchases at forty-seven auctions. Of these, Leigh & Sotheby presented most of the sales. But Porson also bought at sales offered through Edwards, Robson and Clarke, King & Lochée, and he at least interested himself in a Stewart sale. In addition, one has to take into account books given to Porson as prizes or gifts; perhaps books entrusted to him for review; and books for which he subscribed. Addressing the second question is complicated by three factors. First, there is the imperfection of the records. The archives of most houses do not sirvive; even the L&S house-files are, on occasion, imperfect or incompletely legible. Secondly, clerks wrote down what they heard. Often enough, they heard ‘Pawson’ or ‘Pauson’, and it was needful to establish identity. Thirdly, there are difficulties in the way of determining specific editions: these range from the existence of multiple editions or impressions to incompleteness of library records and of descriptions of volumes of tracts.
Τι λένε οι χρήστες - Σύνταξη κριτικής
Δεν εντοπίσαμε κριτικές στις συνήθεις τοποθεσίες.
accedunt adiecit Aeschylus Alexander Dyce Amstelodami animaduersionibus apud Aristophanes Athenaeus auction auctores Bibliotheca books bookseller Bowerbank Burney Cambridge Charles Burney Charterhouse School classical scholar collector commentariis Cuthell John Cuthell edition eiusdem epistolae Euripides ex ofcina flyleaf folio Greek Heber Richard Heber Iacobi illustrauit Ioannis James Henry Monk John Henry Renouard late libri Lipsiae Londini London Institution lots Lugduni Batauorum Lunn William Henry McKinlay John Mackinlay Monk James Henry notae notis number nunc primum opera Oxonii Parisiis Pawson Payne perhaps identical perhaps John Henry Peter Paul Dobree Pinelli Porson sale Porson’s copy Porsonian printed purchased quae quibus R. H. Evans recensuit Renouard perhaps John Richard Porson Routh scholia siue sold Sotheby Stephanus submitted a bid Taylor Thomas Joseph Drury Thomas Thorpe Thorpe Thomas Thorpe Toup Trinity adv Trinity College typis uersione ueterum unidentified fl Valpy Valpy family valuable library Venetiis Vice-master William Henry Lunn XVIII