All India Reporter, Τόμος 6;Τόμος 9,Μέρος 5D.V. Chitaley, 1922 Vols. 1-36, 1914-1949, 1999- issued in separate parts, called sections, e.g. Journal section, Federal Court section, Privy Council section, Allahabad section, Bombay section, etc. |
Άλλες εκδόσεις - Προβολή όλων
Συχνά εμφανιζόμενοι όροι και φράσεις
accused admitted adverse possession alleged allowed amount Amraoti antecedent debt application Berar Civil Procedure Code claim co-sharers contract costs death decided decision decree-holder deed defendant DHOBLEY District Judge document entitled evidence execution fact father favour filed gage grant ground guardian heirs held High Court Hindu Hindu Law holding Husain Inam Indian Indian Penal Code interest Jagir joint family judgment Judgment:-The Khan Kuar Kunbi lambardar land learned Judge learned Subordinate Judge lease liable Limitation Act lower Appellate Court Lower Burma lower Court Magistrate marriage Maung ment mesne profits minor mort mortgage mortgagor Nagpur Narain opinion Oudh paid parties passed payment person perty plaint plaintiff plea pleader possession Prasad present suit Privy Council proceedings profits proved question reference rent Respondent Revenue rule Second Appeal Section share Singh sion Small Cause Court statement tenant tion transfer village widow
Δημοφιλή αποσπάσματα
Σελίδα 14 - Whoever, by deceiving any person, fraudulently or dishonestly induces the person so deceived to deliver any property to any person, or to consent that any person shall retain any property, or intentionally induces the person so deceived to do or omit to do anything which he would not do or omit if he were not so deceived, and which act or omission •causes or is likely to cause damage or harm to that person in body, mind, reputation or property, is said to
Σελίδα 173 - implicates the accused,' compendiously incorporates the test applicable at common law in the rule of practice. The nature of the corroboration will necessarily vary according to the particular circumstances of the offence charged. It would be in high degree dangerous to attempt to formulate the kind of evidence which would be regarded as corroboration, except to say that corroborative evidence is evidence which shows or tends to show that the story of the accomplice that the accused committed the...
Σελίδα 272 - Procedure, section 151, it is provided that " nothing in this Code shall be deemed to' limit or otherwise affect the inherent power of the Court to make such orders as may be necessary for the ends of justice, or to prevent abuse of the process of the Court.
Σελίδα 174 - What is the real meaning of the phrase, ' a cause of action arising in the city'? It has been defined in Cooke v. Gill, LR 8 CP 107, to be this: every fact which it would be necessary for the plaintiff to prove if traversed in order to support his right to the judgment of the Court.
Σελίδα 86 - ... to have acted in the exercise of its jurisdiction illegally or with material irregularity, the High Court may make such order in the case as it thinks fit.
Σελίδα 10 - Every contract by which any one is restrained from exercising a lawful profession, trade, or business of any kind, otherwise than is provided by the next two sections, is to that extent void.
Σελίδα 174 - Cause of action has been held from the earliest time to mean every fact which is material to be proved to entitle the plaintiff to succeed — every fact which the defendant would have a right to traverse.
Σελίδα 172 - We hold that evidence in corroboration must be independent testimony which affects the accused by connecting or tending to connect him with the crime. In other words, it must be evidence which implicates him, that is, which confirms in some material particular not only the evidence that the crime has been committed, but also that the prisoner committed it.
Σελίδα 71 - The mutual rights and duties of partners, whether ascertained by agreement or defined by this Act, may be varied by the consent of all the partners, and such consent may be either express or inferred from a course of dealing.
Σελίδα 173 - The corroboration need not be direct evidence that the accused committed the crime; it is sufficient if it is merely circumstantial evidence of his connection with the crime.