...declared that "suits in equity shall not be sustained in either of the courts of the United States in any case where a plain, adequate and complete remedy may be had at law." But New Jersey is distinguished from her sister states by her adherence to the standards of the mother...

...places it beyond all question, that, in the federal courts, there can be no concurrency of jurisdiction, in any case where a plain, adequate and complete remedy may be had at law. The case of Boi/ce's Executors vs. Grundy, 3 Peters 215. Robinson vs. Campbell, 3 Wheaton 212. Bean vs....

...jurisdiction is established, and it is well settled that the equity tribunals have no jurisdiction where a plain, adequate and complete remedy may be had at law. Richardson vs. Stillinger, 12 G. ^ J. 477. " This then being a bill for an account, and of a character...

...provides that "suits in equity shall not be sustained in either of the courts of the United States, in any case where a plain, adequate, and complete remedy may be had at law." And this provision has been often recognized and enforced by the Supreme Court of the United States;...

...explained in the judiciary act, is not to be exercised in either of the courts of the United States in any case where a plain, adequate, and complete remedy may be had at law ;3 but this enactment is declaratory merely of the existing law.4 It has also been said that the practice...

...the jurisdiction of the equity courts of the United States is, that no suit can be sustained in them, where a plain, adequate, and complete remedy may be had at law. The court has said : " It is not enough that there is a remedy at law ; it must be plain and adequate,...

...137.] Sec. 723. Suits in equity shall not be sustained in either of the courts of the United States in any case where a plain, adequate, and complete remedy may be had at law. Final Record — How made. [Rev. Stat. 141.] Sec. 750. In equity and admiralty causes, only the process,...

...submitted itself to the jurisdiction of a court of equity, and gave a decree against the appellant. [2-4] A bill in equity does not lie in any case where a...plain, adequate, and complete remedy may be had at law. Singer Sewing Machine Co. v. Benedict, 229 US 481, 33 Sup. Ct. 942, 57 L. Ed. 1288. But the objection...

...Statutes) is: "Suits in equity shall not be sustained in either of the courts of the United States, in any case where a plain, adequate, and complete remedy may be had at law." Moreover, the provision guarantying jury trial in civil cases is not absolute in respect to jurisdiction,...

...providing that "suits in equity shall not be sustained in any court of the United States in any cnsei where a plain, adequate, and complete remedy may be had at law," the remedy at law to exclude equity jurisdiction must exist in Hie federal courts. 3. Taxation <g==>375(...