Murray v McDougal Neafie v Ackermans Exec'rs Morris v Hoff Morrow v McClenan Mowerson & al. v Vandergrift 118 Prosser v Richards Murphy's Adm's v Davis & al. 618 Quimby v Gilman Naylor and al. v Champion Neale v Collins Nelson's Adm'r v Goldon Ramsey v Emmons 463 Smock 150 669 Probasco v Probasco 737 274 671 350 Quick v Overseers of Amwell 740 326 695 475 115 Randolph v Bayles 37 421 Rattoon v Webb 454 62 Readington v Tewkesbury 209 464 Reed v Pierson 502 69 Reeves v Goff 105, 454 549 60 Reid v Crawford's Adm's 462 Toole v Gillespie Tracy v Bowen Tompkins and al. v Baily 729 Westervelt v Marinus and al. Torrence ahd al, v Van Emburg 77 Westfall and al. v Donovan Townsend v Johnson Truax v Truax's Adm'r Turnpike, P & H. v Van Orden Van Auken and al, v Decker 48 Van Doren's Ad'rs 745 Wills v Brown 469 Warren v Fisher 638 Waters v Van Winkle, 1 Weller v Park 175 424, 587 488 510 49 519 Whiley v Bradway 725 701 Whitall v Johnson 397 121 Whitall's ad'r v Vaughn's ad'r 472 694 White v Cranmer 412 402 502 And al. v Leonard 411 201 717 411 CASES ADJUDGED IN THE SUPREME COURT OF JUDICATURE OF THE STATE OF NEW-JERSEY. MAY TERM, 1806. [*] ANDREW ROSE vs. JOHN A. JOHNSON. ON CERTIORARI. THIS was a certiorari to Edward Burd, Esquire, one of the Justices of the Peace, of the county of Sussex. The Chief Justice delivered the opinion of the court. This action was brought in the court below, against Andrew Rose, the now plaintiff, as appears by the state of demand, filed with the Justice, upon an assumption to pay the debt of one Elizabeth Rose. From the return of the Justice, it appears that no such assumption, if made at all, was made in writing, or signed by the party. Upon the provisions, therefore, of the act, for the prevention of frauds and perjuries, this action cannot be sustained. See post. 98, 662. Let the judgment be reversed. [*] GOULD and TOMKINS vs. BAILLEY. ON CERTIORARI. THIS certiorari was brought on a judgment obtained by the defendant in this court, who was plaintiff below, before David D. Crane, Esquire, of Essex county, against the plaintiffs in this Court, who were sued below, as late Overseers of the Poor, of the township of Caldwell, for medicine furnished, and attendance given, by the plaintiff below, to |