Εικόνες σελίδας
PDF
Ηλεκτρ. έκδοση

soning may be applied to any other ratio beside that of 7 to 4; nence, whatever be the ratio, provided it is commensurable, we have

ABCD: AEFD::AB: AE.

Let us suppose, in the second place, that the bases AB, AE
(fig. 100), are incommensurable; we shall have notwithstanding Fig, 100.
ABCD: AEFD:: AB: AE.

For, if this proportion be not true, the three first terms remaining the same, the fourth will be greater or less than AE. Let us suppose that it is greater, and that we have

ABCD: AEFD::AB: AO.

Divide the line AB into equal parts smaller than EO, and there will be at least one point of division I between E and 0: at this point erect the perpendicular IK; the bases AB, AI, will be commensurable, and we shall have, according to what has just been demonstrated,

ABCD: AIKD::AB: AI.

But we have, by hypothesis,

ABCD: AEFD::AB: AO.

In these two proportions the antecedents are equal, therefore the consequents are proportional (1); that is

AIKD: AEFD:: AI: AO.

Now AO is greater than AI; it is necessary then, in order that this proportion may take place, that the rectangle AEFD should be greater than AIKD; but it is less; therefore the proportion is impossible, and ABCD cannot be to AEFD, as AB is to a line greater than AE.

By a process entirely similar it may be shown, that the fourth term of the proportion cannot be smaller than AE; consequently it is equal to AE.

Whatever therefore be the ratio of the bases, two rectangles ABCD, AEFD, of the same altitude, are to each other as their bases AB, AE.

THEOREM.

172. Any two rectangles ABCD, AEGF (fig. 101), are to each Fig. 101. other, as the products of their bases by their altitudes, that is,

ABCD: AEGF:: AB × AD: AE × AF.

[ocr errors]

Fig. 102.

Demonstration. Having disposed the two rectangles in such a manner, that the angles at A shall be opposite to cach other, produce the sides GE, CD, till they meet in H; the two rectangles ABCD, AEHD, have the same altitude AD; they are consequently to each other as their bases AB, AE. Likewise the two rectangles AEHD, AEGF, have the same altitude AE; these are therefore to each other as their bases AD, AF. We have thus the two proportions

ABCD: AEHD :: AB : AE,

AEHD: AEGF:: AD: AF.

Multiplying these proportions in order and observing, that the connecting term AEHD may be omitted, being a multiplier common to the antecedent and consequent, we have

ABCD: AEGF :: AB × AD: AE × AF.

173. Scholium. We may take for the measure of a rectangle the product of its base by its altitude, provided that, by this product, we understand that of two numbers which are the number of linear units contained in the base, and the number of linear units contained in the altitude.

This measure, however, is not absolute, but relative; it supposes that we estimate, in a similar manner, another rectangle by measuring its sides by the same linear unit; we obtain thus a second product, and the ratio of these two products is equal to that of the rectangles, conformably to the proposition, which has just been demonstrated.

If, for example, the base of a rectangle A (fig. 102) be three units and its altitude ten, the rectangle would be represented by the number 3 × 10, or 30, a number which, thus disconnected, has no meaning; but, if we have a second rectangle B, whose base is twelve and altitude seven units, this rectangle will be represented by the number 7 × 12, or 84. Whence the two rectangles A and B are to each other, as 30 to 84. If therefore it is agreed to take the rectangle A, as the unit of measure for surfaces, the rectangle B will have for its absolute measure, that is, it will be equal to superficial units.

The more common and simple method is to take the square as the unit of surface; and that square has been preferred, whose side is the unit of length; the measure therefore, which we have regarded as simply relative, becomes absolute. The number 30, for example, by which we have measured the rectangle A,

[graphic]

represents 30 superficial units, or 30 of those squares, the side of each of which is equal to unity. This is illustrated by figure

In geometry, the product of two lines often signifies the same thing as their rectangle, and this expression is introduced into arithmetic to denote the product of two unequal numbers, as that of square is used to express the product of a number by itself.

The squares of the numbers 1, 2, 3, &c., are 1, 4, 9, &c. Thus a double line gives a quadruple square (fig. 103), a triple Fig. 103. line a square nine times as great, and so on.

THEOREM.

174. The area of any parallelogram is equal to the product of its base by its altitude.

Demonstration. The parallelogram ABCD (fig. 97) is equiva- Fig. 97. lent to the rectangle ABEF, which has the same base AB and the same altitude BE (167); but this last has for its measure AB × BE (173); therefore AB × BE is equal to the area of the parallelogram ABCD.

175. Corollary. Parallelograms of the same base are to each other as their altitudes, and parallelograms of the same altitude are to each other as their bases; for, A, B, C, being any three magnitudes whatever, we have generally Ax C: BX C:: A: B.

THEOREM.

176. The area of a triangle is equal to the product of its base by half of its altitude.

Demonstration. The triangle ABC (fig. 104) is half of the Fig. 104. parallelogram ABCE, which has the same base BC and the same altitude AD (168); now the area of the parallelogram = BC × AD (174); therefore the area of the triangle = BC × AD, or BCX

AD.

177. Corollary. Two triangles of the same altitude are to each other as their bases, and two triangles of the same base are to each other as their altitudes.

THEOREM.

178. The area of a trapezoid ABCD (fig. 105) is equal to the Fig. 105. product of its altitude EF by half of the sum of its parallel sides AB, CD.

[graphic]

Demonstration. Through the point I, the middle of the side CB, draw KL parallel to the opposite side AD, and produce DC 'till it meet KL in K.

In the triangles IBL, ICK, the side IB = IC, by construction; the angle LIB = CIK, and the angle IBL ICK, since CK and BL are parallel (67); therefore these triangles are equal (38), and the trapezoid ABCD is equivalent to the parallelogram ADKL, and has for its measure EFX AL.

But AL = DK; and, since the triangle IBL is equal to the triangle KCI, the side BL = CK; therefore

AB+ CD=AL + DK = 2AL;

thus AL is half the sum of the sides AB, CD; and consequently the area of the trapezoid ABCD is equal to the product of the altitude EF by half the sum of the sides AB, CD, which may be expressed in this manner; ABCD = EF ×

(AB + CD).

179. Scholium. If through the point I, the middle of BC, IH be drawn parallel to the base AB, the point H will also be the middle of AD; for the figure AHIL is a parallelogram, as well as DHIK, since the opposite sides are parallel; we have therefore AH IL, and DH = IK; but IL IK, because the triangles BIL, CIK, are equal; therefore AH = DH.

=

AL =

AB + CD 2

[ocr errors]

It may be remarked, that the line HI therefore the area of the trapezoid may be expressed also by EFX HI; that is, it is equal to the product of the altitude of the trapezoid by the line joining the middle points of the sides which are not parallel.

Fig. 106.

THEOREM.

180. If a line AC (fig. 106) is divided into two parts AB, BC, the square described upon the whole line AC will contain the square described upon the part AB, plus the square described upon the other part BC, plus twice the rectangle contained by the two parts AB, BC; which may be thus expressed,

-2

AC or (AB + BC)= AB + BC + 2AB x BC.

Demonstration. Construct the square ACDE, take AF AB, draw FG parallel to AC, and BH parallel to AE.

[ocr errors]

The square ACDE is divided into four parts; the first ABIF is the square described upon AB, since AF was taken equal to AB; the second IGDH is the square described upon BC; for, since AC AE, and AB AF, the difference AC-AB-AE-AF, which gives BC= EF; but, on account of the parallels, IG = BC, and DG EF, therefore HIGD is equal to the square described upon BC. These two parts being taken from the whole square, there remain the two rectangles BCGI, EFIH, which have each for their measure AB × BC; therefore the square described upon AC, &c.

181. Scholium. This proposition corresponds to that given in algebra for the formation of the square of a binomial, which is thus expressed,

(a + b)2 = a2 +2ab+b2.

THEOREM.A

182. If the line AC (fig. 107) is the difference of two lines AB, Fig. 107. BC, the square described upon AC will contain the square of AB, plus the square of BC, minus twice the rectangle contained by AB

[blocks in formation]

Demonstration. Construct the square ABIF, take AE = AC, draw CG parallel to BI, HK parallel to AB, and finish the square EFLK.

The two rectangles CBIG, GLKD, have each for their measure AB × BC; if we subtract them from the whole figure

[blocks in formation]

ABILKEA, which has for its value AB + BC it is evident, that there will remain the square ACDE; therefore, if the line AC, &c.

183. Scholium. This proposition answers to the algebraic formula (ab)2 =a 2 +b2 2 a b.

THEOREM.

184. The rectangle contained by the sum and difference of two lines is equal to the difference of their squares; that is,

[blocks in formation]

(AB + BC) × (AB — BC) = AB— BC (fig. 108). Demonstration. Construct upon AB and AC the squares ABIF, ACDE; produce AB making_BK = BC, and complete the rectangle AKLE.

[blocks in formation]
[ocr errors][merged small]
« ΠροηγούμενηΣυνέχεια »