Εικόνες σελίδας
PDF
Ηλεκτρ. έκδοση

letters each, of which then letters are susceptible. But we shall obtain every time, n-1 results; thus,

[merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small]

-1 re

[ocr errors]

Now since there are n letters, each to be combined with n— served letters, there will be in all n(n-1) results. That is,

The number of permutations of ʼn letters taken two at a time, is n(n-1).

Second:-If we consider each of the permutations of the n letters with two in a set, apart from the other letters, there will be in every case n— -2 reserved letters. Hence, to permute the n letters with three in a set, we shall have n— -2 reserved letters, to be annexed successively to each of the n(n-1) permutations with two in a set, thus forming n(n−1)(n—2) new results. That is,

The number of permutations of ʼn letters taken three at a time, is n(n-1) (n-2).

If the permutations of the n letters taken r-1 at a time were formed, there would be with respect to each, n-(-1), or n―r+1, reserved letters. And we might conjecture from the two preceding cases, that the number of permutations of n letters taken r at a time, is n(n-1) (n-2)....(n—r+1).

(4)

or, the product of the natural numbers from ʼn down to n-r+1, inclusive.

This may be demonstrated in a general manner, as follows: Let x and x' represent any two consecutive numbers less than n, so that x+1=x'. (1)

Let P represent the permutations of n letters taken x in a set, and P' the number of permutations of the letters taken x+1 or x' in a set.

Now if we consider each of the P permutations apart from the other letters, there will be in every case n-x reserved letters. Thus we have n―x reserved letters to be annexed successively to each of the P permutations, in order to form the P' permutations

with x+1 or x' letters in a set. This will give P(n—r) results; and we therefore have

[blocks in formation]

Now we will show that if, according to the law already enunciated, P= n(n-1) (n-2)....(n−x+1), (3)

then the value of P' will be expressed by a similar formula. For, multiply both members of equation (3) by n―x, and equate the result with the second member of (2); we have

P' = n(n−1) (n—2) ...(n—x).

But from equation (1), we have

[ocr errors]

Substituting this value of x in equation (4), gives

[blocks in formation]

(4)

(5)

Equations (3) and (5) are similar in form. Thus we have shown that if formula (4) holds when the letters are taken x at a time, it will hold when the letters are taken x+1 at a time. But it has been proved to hold when the letters are taken three at a time; hence it holds when they are taken four at a time; hence also it holds when they are taken five at a time, and so on. Thus it is true universally.

NOTE.--In the practical application of formula (A), it will be well to remember that the number of factors is equal to the number of letters taken in a set.

338. To find the number of permutations of n things taken all at a time, put r = n in formula (A); the result will be

That is,

n(n−1) (n—2)....1.

(B)

The number of permutations of n things taken all together in a set, is equal to the continued product of the natural numbers from n down to 1, inclusive.

339. To find the number of combinations of n things taken r ut a time.

Let Z= the number of combinations of n things, taken r in a set; P= the number of permutations of n things, taken ~ in a set; P' the number of permutations of r things, taken all together

=

Now it is evident that all of the P permutations can be obtained, by subjecting the r things in each of the Z combinations to all the permutations of which they are susceptible. But a single combination of r things produces P' permutations, taking all the things in a set; hence the Z combinations will give ZXP' permutations, and we shall therefore have

[blocks in formation]

The number of combinations of n letters taken r at a time, is equal to the continued product of the natural numbers from n down to n-r+1 inclusive, divided by the continued product of the natural numbers from r down to 1 inclusive.

340. It is evident that for every combination of r things which we take out of n things, there will be left a combination of n-r things. That is, every possible combination containing r things, corresponds to a combination of n-r things which remain. Hence,

The number of combinations of n things taken r at a time, is equal to the number of combinations of n things taken n―r at a time.

This proposition may be demonstrated algebraically as follows:

Let Z represent the number of combinations of n things taken r at a time, and Z the number of combinations of n things taken n―r at a time. Let it be observed that the last factor in the numerator of Z' will be n—(n—r)+1 = r+1. Then

[blocks in formation]
[merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][ocr errors]

341. To find for what value of r, the number of combinations of n things taken r at a time is the greatest.

Consider r as a varying quantity, being at first unity, and changing to 2, 3, 4, .... successively.

any

Let Z represent the number of combinations for value of r, and Z' the number of combinations for the succeeding value of r. We have

=

n(n−1)(n−2). . . . (n−r+2) (n−r+1)

`r(r−1)(r−2)....1

(1)

And if in this equation we change r to r+1, the result must be the value of Z'; thus,

Z

=

n(n−1)(n—2)....(n—r+1)(n—r)
(+1)()(-1)....1

(2)

Divide (2) by (1), observing that in the second member of (2), the factor which immediately precedes (n-r+1) is (n-r+2); we

[blocks in formation]

Now Z' is greater or less than Z, according as

less than unity. That is, when

n-r >1,

[blocks in formation]

r+1

the number of combinations will be increased by giving to r its succeeding value; but when

[ocr errors][merged small]

the number of combinations will be diminished by giving to r its succeeding value.

[merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][subsumed][ocr errors]

Hence, that value of r which will give the greatest number of

n -1
2

combinations, must not be less than

n-1
2

or greater than +1,

[blocks in formation]

; hence, it will have one of the three values,

[ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small]

1st. Suppose n even.

Then the first and third values will be

fractional, and therefore impossible for r; hence in this case

[merged small][merged small][ocr errors]

2d. Suppose n odd. Then the second value will be fractional, and consequently impossible for r; hence, in this case r must have at least one of the other values. We will show that it may have either of them. For, suppose

[merged small][ocr errors][merged small]

By (340), the number of combinations will be the same, if

[merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors]

That is, when n is odd, the greatest number of combinations will be obtained by making

[blocks in formation]

n+1
2

the two values of r giving the same result.

EXAMPLES OF PERMUTATIONS AND COMBINATIONS.

1. How many different permutations may be formed of 10 letters taken four at a time?

Ans. 5040.

2. How many different permutations may be made of 6 things taken all together in a set?

Ans. 720.

« ΠροηγούμενηΣυνέχεια »