...were said to be unconstitutional on these grounds, namely : — Smith v. State of Maryland. article of the constitution of the United States, which grants to congress the power to regulate commerce with foreign nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian tribes. 2. Because they are...

...is whether tho tax was in violation of the clanse of the Constitution of the United States granting to Congress the power to regulate commerce among the several States. The plaintiffin error contends that its cars could be taxed only In the State of 11linois, in which it...

...its police power. 'Mi its Jurisdiction over persons and property within its limits, a state pro*ides for the security of the lives, health and comfort of persons and the protection of property, and imposes taxes upon persons residing within the state or belonging to its population, and upon vocations...

...unconstitutional and void as repugnant to the clause of the Constitution of the United States granting to Congress the power to regulate commerce among the several States. The United States Supreme Court haying decided a statute unconstitutional which imposed a licence fee or...

...a "regulation of commerce" within the terms of the third paragraph of section eight. Article I, of the Constitution of the United States, which grants to Congress "the power to regulate commerce with foreign nations, and among the several States." and said act is therefore unconstitutional and...

...commerce; that it is a regulation in conflict with the Constitution of the United States, which gives to Congress the power to regulate commerce among the several States. The court admits that it is competent for the States, in the absence of congressional legislation, to legislate...

...is whether the tax was in violation of the clause of the Constitution of the United States granting to Congress the power to regulate commerce among the several States. The plaintiff in error contends that its cars could be taxed only in the State of Illinois, in which it...

...contravening article 1, section 8, sub-division 3 of the Constitution of the United States, which gives to Congress the power " to regulate commerce among the several States." The law is thus laid down by the Supreme Court of the United States in Oilman v. Philadelphia, 3 Wall....

...contravening Art. I., Sec. 8, sub-division 3 of the Constitution of the United States, which gives to Congress the power " to regulate commerce among the several States. The law is thus laid down by the Supreme Court of the United States in Gilmore v. Philadelphia, 3 Wall....

...the stipulated penalty, is unconstitutional and void, in that it violates section 8 of article 1 of the Constitution of the United States, which grants...Congress the power to regulate commerce among the several states. Under the provisions of the statute regulating the consideration of appeals by this...