...slight modification. The case was held to fall within the principle, as put by the Lord Chancellor, "that nobody has any right to represent his goods as the goods of somebody else." Lord Herschell, referring to Wotherspoon T. Currie, LR 5 HL 508, said : "The name 'Glenfield' had become...

...former decisions to disentangle what is decided as fact and what is laid down as a principle of law. For myself I believe the principle of law may be very...represent his goods as the goods of somebody else. How far the use of particular words, signs, or pictures does or does not come up to the proposition...

...recently ruled, that the principle announced in Reddaway v. Banhaai, T^IT' [I89fi] A- C- '99. 204, 1896, that "nobody has any right to represent his goods as the goods of somebody else." has no limit as regards name, origin, honesty of manufacture or sale, or otherwise ; and that a trader...

...one sentence in the first paragraph of the lord chancellor's speech moving the judgment of the house: 'Nobody has any right to represent his goods as the goods of somebody else.' Observe that the proposition is perfectly general. There is no limit as regards name, oripin, honesty...

...one sentence in the first paragraph of the Lord Chancellor's speech moving the judgment of the House, "Nobody has any right to represent his goods as the goods of somebody else." Observe that the proposition is perfectly general. There is no limit as regards name, origin, honesty...

...one sentence in the lirst paragraph of the Lord Chancellor's speech moving the judgment of the House, ''Nobody has any right to represent his goods as the goods of somebody else.'' Observe that the proposition is perfectly general. There is no limit as regards name, origin, honesty...

...former decisions to disentangle what is decided as fact and what is laid down as a principle of law. For myself, I believe the principle of law may be...represent his goods as the goods of somebody else. How far the use of particular words, signs, or pictures does or does not come up to the proposition...

...Halsbury, in delivering his opinion in the house of lords, stated that the case rested on the principle "that nobody has any right to represent his goods as the goods of somebody else" (page 204), and Lord Herschell said: "In my opinion, the doctrine on which the Judgment of the court...

...p. 284. And in a former passage in the judgment he defines the false representation thus (p. 283): "Nobody has any right to represent his goods as the goods of somebody else." In none of the three instances deposed to, was any one deceived by the "get-up;" and, when the articles...

...Reddaway v. Banham (LR (1896), AC 199), known as the " Camel Hair Belting " case, where he says : — " For myself, I believe the principle of law may be...represent his goods as the goods of somebody else." In the case of Saxlehner v. Apollinaris Company, Kekewich, J. (LR, 1 Ch. Div., 893), in commenting...