 | New Jersey. Court of Chancery - 1887 - 812 σελίδες
...interest of the party in favor of whom it is given, and not so large as to interfere with the interest of the public. Whatever restraint is larger than the...oppressive, it is, in the eye of the law, unreasonable and void, on the ground of public policy, as being injurious to the interests of the public. The rule,... | |
 | Great Britain. Court of Common Pleas, Peregrine Bingham - 1831 - 850 σελίδες
...whether the restraint is such only as to afford a fair protection to the interests of the party in favour of whom it is given, and not so large as to interfere...oppressive, it is, in the eye of the law, unreasonable. Whatever is injurious to the interests of the public is void, on the grounds of public policy. In the... | |
 | Great Britain. Court of Common Pleas, John Bayly Moore, Joseph Payne - 1832 - 874 σελίδες
...restraint is larger than the necessary protection of the party can be of no benefit to either; it 1831. can only be oppressive; and, if oppressive, it is in the eye of the law unreasonable. Whatever is injurious to the interests of the public is void, on the grounds of public policy. In the... | |
 | Samuel Bealey Harrison, Great Britain. Court of King's Bench, Frederick Luard Wollaston - 1837 - 520 σελίδες
...whether the restraint is such only as to afford a fair protection to the interests of the party in favour of whom it is given, and not so large as to interfere...oppressive, it is, in the eye of the law, unreasonable. Whatever is injurious to the interest of the public is void, on the grounds of public policy." It may... | |
 | Great Britain. Court of King's Bench - 1837 - 886 σελίδες
...whether the restraint is such only as to afford a fair protection to the interests of the party in favour of whom it is given, and not so large as to interfere...oppressive, it is in the eye of the law unreasonable. Whatever is injurious to the interests of the public, is void on the grounds of public policy." It... | |
 | Francis Stack Murphy, Edwin Tyrrell Hurlstone, Great Britain. Court of Exchequer - 1838 - 416 σελίδες
...whether the restraint is such only as to afford a fair protection to the interests of the party in favour of whom it is given, and not so large as to interfere...oppressive, it is, in the eye of the law, unreasonable. Whatever is injurious to the interests of the public is void on the grounds of public policy.1' In... | |
 | Great Britain. Court of King's Bench, John Leycester Adolphus, Thomas Flower Ellis - 1838 - 1096 σελίδες
...favour of whom it is given, and again* Col.IV.. not so .large as to interfere with the interests or the public. Whatever restraint is larger than the...oppressive, it is, in the eye of the law, unreasonable. Whatever is injurious to the interests of the public is void, on the grounds of public policy." It... | |
 | 1839 - 474 σελίδες
...should be coextensive only with the benefits meant to be enjoyed on the other."i And by Tindal, CJ : " Whatever restraint is larger than the necessary protection...oppressive, and if oppressive, it is in the eye of the law unreasonable."2 This principle is equally applicable to every other species of restraint, and is the... | |
 | John William Smith - 1841 - 744 σελίδες
...whether the restraint is such only as to afford a fair protection to the interests of the party in favour of whom it is given, and not so large as to interfere...oppressive, it is in the eye of the law unreasonable. Whatever is injurious to the interest of the public is void, on the grounds of public policy. No certain... | |
 | Great Britain. Court of Chancery, Charles Beavan - 1842 - 730 σελίδες
...interests of the public. Whatever restraint is larger than the necessary protection of the party [requires] can be of no benefit to either ; it can only be oppressive,...oppressive, it is in the eye of the law unreasonable. Whatever is injurious to the interests of the public is void on the grounds of public policy." Now,... | |
| |
... of the party in favor of whom it is given, and not so large as to interfere with the interests of the public. Whatever restraint is larger than the necessary protection of the party, can be of no benefit to either. It can only be oppressive, and if... 
