Science on Stage: Expert Advice as Public Drama
Stanford University Press, 2000 - 213 σελίδες
Behind the headlines of our time stands an unobtrusive army of science advisors. Panels of scientific, medical, and engineering experts evaluate the safety of the food we eat, the drugs we take, and the cars we drive. But despite the enormous influence of science advice, its authority is often problematic, and struggles over expert advice are thus a crucial aspect of contemporary politics. Science on Stage is a theoretically informed and empirically grounded study of the social process through which the credibility of expert advice is produced, challenged, and sustained.
Building on the sociology of Erving Goffman, the author analyzes science advice as a form of performance, examining how advisory bodies work to bring authoritative advice to the public stage. From this perspective, advisory bodies emerge as performers who engage in impression management: they selectively reveal and conceal themselves, actively presenting some things to their audiences while hiding others "backstage."
The book demonstrates that techniques for information control--including stagecraft, strategic self-presentation, and unauthorized disclosures or "leaks"--play a fundamental role in efforts to create and contest expert authority. The author uncovers this complex assemblage of dramaturgical machinery through a richly detailed comparative analysis of three controversial reports on diet and health, including a proposed revision to the Recommended Daily Allowances, prepared by the National Academy of Sciences--the most prestigious source of expert advice in the United States today.
This lively and accessible analysis--which includes its own drama, complete with Greek chorus--provides not only new insights about science advice but also a fresh look at the social dimensions of scientific writing. The theatrical metaphor highlights issues that more familiar theoretical frameworks often leave waiting in the wings. In the author's hands, scientific texts emerge not just as rhetorical constructions or forms of discourse, but also as crucial parts of systems for controlling the enclosure and disclosure of information, and thereby for structuring relations between experts and their audiences.
Τι λένε οι χρήστες - Σύνταξη κριτικής
Δεν εντοπίσαμε κριτικές στις συνήθεις τοποθεσίες.
Staging Authoritative Reports
Diet Nutrition and Cancer
The NRC Process
The 1985 Draft of the RDAs
Attacking Advisory Reports
Attacking Toward Healthful Diets
Attacking Diet Nutrition and Cancer
A Drama of Order
A Play in Three Acts
The Kamin Letter
The Dramas Compared
The Chairmans Reply
The Academy Announcement
The Fate of the Reports
The Character of the National Academy of Sciences
The Public Debate over the Demise of the 1985 Draft
The Kamin Letter
Άλλες εκδόσεις - Προβολή όλων
Academy announcement Academy of Sciences Academy reports Academy's actors advisory reports agencies Agricultural Science American American Meat Institute analysis attack audiences authority backstage Boffey chairman characters charges cholesterol CHORAGOS committee members committee's conflict controversy Council for Agricultural credibility critics of Diet debate decision diet and cancer diet and health display dispute documents drama dramaturgical cooperation dramaturgical perspective Epistat evidence example expert expertise Food and Nutrition Frank Press Goffman Handler Healthful Diets Hegsted Ibid information control Institute intake interest issue James Wyngaarden Jasanoff Kamin letter Latour leaks Meat narrative National Academy National Cancer Institute National Research Council NRC process nutrients Nutrition Board official panel performance prepared present procedures produce public identity RDA committee RDA's Recommended Dietary Allowances release rhetorical role science advice Science and Technology scientists Shapin social stage management story studies techniques tion U.S. Department U.S. Senate USDA Victor Herbert vitamins