Εικόνες σελίδας
PDF
Ηλεκτρ. έκδοση

counsel the widow, he came back to his own country, and died in London in 1794.

With all its defects, Gibbon's 'Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire' is a noble monument of genius and industry. The style is extraordinarily elevated and ornate, and resembles rather the antithetical tone of the French literature of the eighteenth century than an idiomatic English work. Indeed, so completely was Gibbon's mind saturated with French sympathies, that there is a tradition that he for some time hesitated whether his great work should be written in French or English. His narration is very clear, animated, and picturesque; he brings before the reader's eye the persons and events which he describes; and wherever his scepticism and prejudices do not interfere, he gives a lively, penetrating, and natural account of the characters and motives of men. But his moral susceptibility was not very delicate, and he frequently lavishes on the external splendour of great actions that enthusiasm which should be reserved for the simple dignity of moral grandeur. His sympathies were somewhat theatrical; and though the general current of his narrative is exceedingly clear, his gorgeousness and measured pomp of language become fatiguing and oppressive. So great is his dread, too, of repeating the same word or name in the same page or at short intervals, that his expedients of finding a synonym are frequently productive of confusion and uncertainty in the reader. We cannot better conclude our remarks than by quoting the excellent and elaborate judgment of Guizot:-"After a first rapid perusal, which allowed me to feel nothing but the interest of a narrative, always animated, and, notwithstanding its extent and the variety of objects which it makes to pass before the view, always perspicuous, I entered upon a minute examination of the details of which it was composed; and the opinion which I then formed was, I confess, singularly severe. I discovered, in certain chapters, errors which appeared to me sufficiently important and numerous to make me believe that they had been written with extreme negligence; in others, I was struck with a certain tinge of partiality and prejudice, which imparted to the exposition of the facts that want of truth and justice which the English express by their happy term misrepresentation. Some imperfect quotations, some passages omitted unintentionally or designedly, have cast a suspicion on the honesty of the author; and his violation of the first law of history-increased to my eyes by the prolonged attention with which I occupied myself with every phrase, every note, every reflection-caused me to form on the whole work a judgment far too rigorous. After having finished my labours, I allowed some time to elapse before I reviewed the whole. A second attentive and regular perusal of the entire work, of the notes of the author,

and of those which I had thought it right to subjoin, showed me how much I had exaggerated the importance of the reproaches which Gibbon really deserved: I was struck with the same errors, the same partiality on certain subjects; but I had been far from doing adequate justice to the immensity of his researches, the variety of his knowledge, and, above all, to that truly philosophical discrimination which judges the past as it would judge the present; which does not permit itself to be blinded by the clouds which time gathers around the dead, and which prevent us from seeing that, under the toga as under the modern dress, in the senate as in our councils, men were what they still are, and that events took place eighteen centuries ago as they take place in our own days. I then felt that his book, in spite of the faults, will always be a noble work; and that we may correct his errors and combat his prejudices without ceasing to admit that few men have combined, if we are not to say in so high a degree, at least in a manner so complete and so well regulated, the necessary qualifications for a writer of history."

CHAPTER XVI.

THE TRANSITION SCHOOL.

Landscape and Familiar Poetry-James Thomson-The Seasons-EpisodesCastle of Indolence-Minor Works-Lyric Poetry-Thomas Gray-The Bard, and the Elegy-Collins and Shenstone-The Schoolmistress-Össian-Chatterton and the Rowley Poems-William Cowper-George Crabbe-The Lowland Scots Dialect and Literature-Robert Burns.

"THE less man really knows," says an eloquent and acute Russian writer, "the greater his contempt for the ordinary, for what surrounds him. A practical every-day truth appears to him a degradation; what we see before our eyes and often, we represent to ourselves as undeserving of attention; we want the far, the remote; il n'y a pas de grand homme pour son valet-de-chambre." What is true of philosophy in general is applicable to art in particular, and to literature, the highest, completest and most perfect of the arts. What is the distinction between the tone of literature of the eighteenth and that of the nineteenth century? What but the substitution of the real and the actual for the abstract and the remote? It is true that the real and the actual are idealised, are glorified, in passing into the golden atmosphere of art, no less than were the abstract and the remote, and this is an indispensable

condition, for the ideal is the very soul of poetry: but we now find in pictures of ordinary life, in the description of common nature, a source of profound pleasure, emotion and improvement. What Coleridge has said of old Paganism may with more justice be applied to the literature of modern times:

"Clothing the palpable and familiar

With golden exhalations of the dawn."

The full and complete daylight of this new era is to be found in Scott, in Byron, in Shelley, in Wordsworth; but the dawning, of the auspicious Aurora was gradual and slow. It was first seen to glimmer (we mean in modern days, for of recent periods only do we speak) in the poetry of Thomson, and then gradually glowed with a stronger light, powerfully hastened in its development by the publication of Percy's 'Reliques of Ancient English Poetry,' by the forgeries of Macpherson, and by the fabrications of Chatterton. Its characteristic was an intense and reverent study of Nature in all her manifestations, whether of physical or intellectual activity of the one Thomson is the type of the other, Cowper and Crabbe.

:

6

The early part of Thomson's career somewhat resembles that of Smollett. He was born in Scotland in 1700, and came up to London to push his fortune as a literary man. He carried with him the unfinished poem of Winter,' some passages of which he had shown to Mallet, by whom he had been strongly advised to publish the work. Arriving in London at the age of eighteen, he obtained the situation of tutor in the family of Lord Binning, which he afterwards exchanged for the more powerful protection of Lord Chancellor Talbot. With the son of this distinguished lawyer Thomson had the advantage of travelling over the Continent, and thus feeding his rich imagination with the fairest scenes of natural magnificence, and filling his ardent fancy with recollections of the great and wise of ancient history. The poem of Winter' was published in 1726, and in the two succeeding years it was followed by its beautiful companions, 'Summer' and Spring,' 'Autumn' not appearing until 1730. The four works together compose a complete cycle of the various appearances of Nature during an English year, and are known to all who feel what is beautiful, as the 'Seasons'-the finest descriptive poem in the English or perhaps in any language. There is no country whose climate affords so great a variety and richness of external beauty as that of Great Britain; none in which the surface of the land is more picturesquely broken into every form and tint of beauty, none more abundant in spots sanctified by memory, none where the changes of climate are more capricious and imposing. The finest art and the most idiomatic literature of England bear

6

6

testimony to the intensity of feeling for the external loveliness of nature which seems to form a distinctive feature of the national character-a trait more marked perhaps among us than even among the ancient Greeks. In that great and peculiar style, invented and principally cultivated in England-descriptive or landscape poetry-Thomson is by far our greatest artist; though this tendency to study and portray nature for herself is singularly perceptible in all the greatest works of purely English genius. With what a fond enthusiasm has Father Chaucer, whose verses are modulated to the forest-music of an English landscape, the gurgle of the brook, the multitudinous rustle of leaves, and, above all, to the liquid melody of birds-with what an earnest joy has this divine poet seized every occasion of painting the physiognomy of English scenery! Spenser's fairy glades are full of this deep passion for nature as nature-Nature looked at for herself: neither Shakspeare nor Milton has ever written any twenty consecutive lines without giving us, often in a single word, and parenthetically, as it were, some touch of natural scenery, some embodiment of physical object familiar as the cloud or the leaf, ever-varying like them, yet, like them, invariable.

In the 'Seasons' of Thomson we have a subject unbounded in variety, yet happily limited in extent; and it is no exaggeration to affirm that there is not a possible modification of English scenery, terrestrial or atmospheric, which he has not caught and fixed for ever. Everything appears in its natural light, in its relative perspective and proportion; and though we are of course carried in succession through the various appearances of the year, he always has the art to conceal the joinings in his canvas, and to give us the feeling of continuity which produces the charm of a well-executed panorama. Above all, the work is animated throughout with so gentle yet so genial a glow of philanthropy and religious gratitude, that its parts are, so to say, fused naturally together; the everchanging landscape is harmonised by this calm. and elevated, and tender spirit, which throws over the whole a soft and all-pervading glow, like the tint of an Italian heaven.

The language and versification, however, are not always worthy of the subject nor of the sentiment of the work. Though very much purified and simplified in his later works, there is often an ambitious tumidity in Thomson's diction not unaccompanied by vulgar and mean expressions; and though in a thousand places he has exhibited a peculiar felicity in finding those appropriate words which paint almost to the eye

"What oft was thought, but ne'er so well expressed,"

he is occasionally deficient in simplicity and chasteness. His blank verse is sonorous and musical, but he did not possess

[ocr errors]

that fineness of ear which seems involuntarily to echo the wild and everchanging voices of nature; nor had he the art of concealing, by an inexhaustible flexibility and sensibility of rhythm, the tendency to monotony which is the prevailing defect of descriptive poetry.

To relieve the uniformity of his plan he has introduced a great number of little tales or episodes, generally suggested by the scene which he is describing. Of these the pathetic pictures are undoubtedly the best; as, for example, the episode of the shepherd perishing in the snow, introduced into the Winter;' and generally where a mixture of the pathetic with the terrible is the emotion to be excited; but when he attempts to be simply graceful, tender, or facetious, his failure is painful and inevitable. Thomson's imagination was intensely sensuous; his delineations of love are very far from romantic; and when he endeavours to idealise the passion, he becomes pitiably stilted, affected, and vulgarly fine; as, for instance, in the bathing scene of Musidora, and little less, though certainly less offensively so, in the so-often-quoted tale of Lavinia.

[ocr errors]

His comic scenes (as the fox-hunting debauch) are utterly gross, and totally discordant with the tone of the rest of the work. That he was not destitute of a rich and even refined humour, we shall see when we come to speak of the exquisite Castle of Indolence.' The Seasons' must be undoubtedly considered, all proper deductions made, a truly great and beautiful work. If the poet has sometimes fallen into the affectation of classicism, and drawn from the ancients instead of from nature; if with the majestic accents of his hymn to the Creator-best praised by the glory of his works-he has allowed to mingle some accents of earthly adulation; if he be sometimes tedious, or solemn out of season; if his ornaments be sometimes meretricious, and his language sometimes too heavy for the thought—all this, and much more, we can pardon him, for he has interpreted the book of Nature with a penetrating yet reverent eye; he has made us feel the loveliness of a thousand objects which escape us from their very familiarness; and he has given to his country the glory of originating a new, elevating, and beautiful species of writing, of which the antique literature offers no example.

The success of 'The Seasons' was so great as to enable Thomson (with the assistance of a government sinecure given him by Talbot) to purchase a cottage on the banks of the Thames near Richmond, and pass the rest of his days in comfort and even luxury. During the whole of his career he continued a pretty industrious writer, and composed several tragedies in the false and unhealthy taste of that day, which were neither very successful at that time nor deserving of any notice since. They are all

« ΠροηγούμενηΣυνέχεια »