Εικόνες σελίδας
PDF
Ηλεκτρ. έκδοση

Reynolds and Hartwell, Clapp v. 523 Sacket v. Lothrop

445 Jackson, ex dem. Low, Sacrider y. Van Antwerp

561 et al. v. 580 Sacket v. Swist

471 Rhinebeck, Comm’rs of Highways Saidler, Winton y.

185, 546 of, People v. 562 Salisbury &c. v. Huyck

483 Rhinelanders, Duguet v. 458 Salter and Steele v. Birdgen 447 and others, Governeur and Saltonstall v. White

443 Kemble y.

120, 540 Sample, Fitzroy and others v. 449 Juhel v. 484 Sands, Bird and others v.

454 Mackay v.

467 Sands, Jackson ex dem. St. Croix v. Stienback v. 269, 565

491 Rhodes, Frisbie v.

467

Rendtorff and Moller v. 498 Rice v. Clendening and Adams 183, Sanger, Herring v.

71, 533 555 Savage and Dugan v. The United Rice, Keating v. 425 Ins. Co.

558 Richardson v. Annin

489 Sayer and Herd, Brevoort v. 517 Rich and others, Stuart v. 590 Schureman v. Haight

( 572 Richmire v. Stuker

569 Scofield and wife v. Loder 452, 482, Ricket and others, Munro and Roe v.

550 552 | Scott v. Gibbs

472 Rickets and wife v. Livingston, ex'r adm’rs of v. Morgan 601

479 & Seaman v. Mark and Speyer Riggs v. Denniston 198, 549

525 Kingwood Iron Co., Murray v. 507 Scribner, Hickock v. 311, 610 Ripley v. Wendell

586 Seaman and others, Covenhoven v. Robertson and Brown v. The Un.

425 Ins. Co.

499

V. Drake 527, Robins, Platt v. 443, 457

572, 578 Robinson y. The New York Ins. Co.

y. Haskins

487, 503 594 Sebor v. Abbot

39, 530 Rodmans v. Nelson and Bunker 522

Abbot v.

39, 530 Roe, Doe v. 424, 467, 560, 564 Haskins v.

490 Rogers y. Coon 603 Sebin, Palmer v.

473 Jackson ex dem. Van Alen v. Seely v. Shattuck

472, 481 428, 457 Sebrers and Van Wyck v. Rathbone Roget, Bazen v. 87,536

462 Phillips v. 551 Seezie, Hathaway v.

518 v. Thurston

499 Seixas and Abrahams v. Ingraham Rooman v. Smith, Jackson ex dem.

545 427 and Ingraham, Abrahams v. Roosevelt, Crammond v. 501

548 Wilkie v. 66, 206, 532, 548

Ready v.

515 Resekians v. Bostwick

508 Service v. Heermance and Kip 560 Rozell, Yates v.

600 Seron and Maitland v. Long 425 Rumsey, Jackson ex dem. Wood- Sharp v. Dusenberry

473 hull v. 234, 558 Shattuck, Seely v.

472, 481 Rundle and others v. Moore and Shaw, Earl v.

455 Pollock

36, 530

Loomis and Tillinghast v. 477 Rush v. Cobbett

482, 500
The People v.

587 Russel v. Ball 91 Shelden v. McEvert

A38 v. Bull, et al. 541 Shell v. Getwan

554 v. Leavenworth 501 Shell v. Myers

554 Whitney y. 566 Shepherd, Case v.

445, 476 Rust, the People v.

587 Sherman and Keeler, Dearin v. 513 Rutgers v. Sweet 478 Sherwood, Gifford y.

477 Ryers, Thayer v. 434, 437 Shivers, Braine v.

580 Shoemakers, Gourly v.

453 Shulelt, Hodges y.

521 S Shurileff v. Whalen

561 Shute v. Davis and Davis

513 Bable v. Hitchcock 453, 479 Sicord, Deane v.

607 YOL. III.

С

9

[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]

Silva v. Low
442, 459 Striker, Richmore v.

569 Silvester v. Brando

513
Thomas y.

90, 538 Sissons, Jackson ex dem. Lewis v. 602 Stuart v. Rich and others

5.90 Potler v. 510 Sturges, Vanderburg v.

563 Skidmores v. Desdoity 479 Stuyvesant v. Ambrose

526 Skinner, Burr v.

451, 490
v. Keteltas

550 Skogstroom v. Delafield and others 571 Suydam v. McCoon

421 Skutt v. Billings 426 Swart and others v. Swart

567 Slater and Love, Latham v. 514

Swart and others v. 567 Sleght, adm'r, v. Kane 429, 497 Swartwout, Gelston v.

432 Slocum and Burling v. The United Sweet, Andrews v.

470 Ins. Co.

442

, Rutgers and others v. 478 Slossen Wheaton v. 470 Swift, Sacket v.

471 Small, Pearsall v.

504 Smith v. Bell and others

611 Smith v. Blagge

448

T
Coit and Woolsey v.

16, 529
v. D'Witt
523 Talmadge v. Holcombe

483
Deas v.
588 Tappen v. Hoffman

506 Dow y.

582 Tarbell, Jackson ex dem. Rattoon Gardner and others v. 442 and Judson v.

456 Rooman v. 427 Teller, La Rue v.

526 Murray v.

430 Tenant v. Steel and Fuller 583 Nitchie v.

501 Terhune, Van Nuys v. 82, 535 and others v. Wilson 295, 566 Thayer v. Post

547 and Stanley v. Wright

574
v. Ryers

434, 437 Snell v. Getman 555 Thompson, People v.

518 Snowden, Haskins v. 505 Thompson v. Tompkins

448, 462 Southampton and others v. Cooley 492 Thomas v. Douglas

494 Spalbergh, Walrod v.

438 Thomas v. New York Ins. Co. 1,527 Spencer, Cruysler v.

495
v. Striker

538 Spencer v. White 436 Thorn v. Beebe

493 Stafford v. Cole

465

and Ohara, Cottrel v. 544 y. Cole and Spalding 592

v. Striker

20 - v. Phelps 430 Thurston, Bogert v.

499 v. Van Zandt 484 Tibbits, Ferguson v.

527 Staats v. Carey 518 Tobey, Beers v.

596 Stagg, Butterworth v. 509 | Todd, Hobson y.

517 Stagg and Snell v. Un. Ins. Co. 34,529 Tomkins, Thompson v. 448, 462 Stansbury v. Durel 452 Toney v. Morehouse

463 Staring v. Deffendorf 592 Towers, Vielle v.

444 Steadfast ex dem. Nicoll v. Nicoll Towle and Jackson v. Stevenson 435

18,529 Townsend, The People v. 430 Steele and Fuller, Tenant v. 583 Tredwell v. McKeel and others 517 Steinback and Murray v. Bowne 560 Trowbridge and Wife v. Dunsbaghs v. Church 554

429 v. Rhinelander et al. 269,563 Tunno and Cox v. Lague 476 Steinburgh, Jackson ex dem., Le Tupper, Nash v.

595 Roys v. 587 Turner, Betts v.

427 Stevenson, Towle and Jackson v. 435 Martin v. Masten

424 Stewarts v. Cunie 546 Tylee, case of,

497 v. Ex’rs of Eden 534

Herring v.

423 Stewarts v. Greenleaf

563 Tyler, Fleming v. v. Williams

481 Storey v. Graham

466

U Stoughton, Fish v.

522 v. Griswold

577 Union Turnpike Co. v. Jenkins 534 Stout v. Colvill

544 United Ins. Co., Abbott v. 536 Le Roy and others v. 602

Arnold and Ram. Strang v. Barber and Griffin 461

455 , Light v.

Bakewell v. 498

429

[ocr errors]

sey v.

543

3

[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]

United Ins. Co., Church v. 545 | Van Patten v. Onderkirk

469 , Delavigne v. 456 Van Rensselaer, case of,

483 Dupuy v. 182, 552

v. Clark

507 Franklin v. 484, 504

Corporation of
Holmes, v.
511

Albany v. 604
Juhel v.
522

v. Dole 447, 458, 461 Laing v. 485

v. Mallory 556 Lenox v. 178, 224,

Peacock v. 495 552, 559

Ex'rs of, v. Ex'rs v. Lenox 451

of Platner 475 Muir and Boyd v.

Devisees of, v. 576

Ex'rs of Platner 475 Murray v. 485 Van Schaick v. Edwards

519 Robertson and Van Zandt, Stafford v.

484 Brown v. 499

Van Demar v.

484 Savage and Dun. Veeder and others v. Gourlay

303 can v.

558 Viar, Lynch and Sloughton v. 303 Slocum and Bur- Vielle v. Powers

444 ling v.

442 and Vielle v. Bennet 557 Stagg and Snell v. Villers and Williams, White 439

34, 529 Viely and Clark v. Cuerden 512, 519 Vandenheuvel v. Vischer, Van Alen v.

463 486 Voorbis, Freeholders of Gravesend v. Vos and Graves v.

448 486

Jackson ex dem. Prior v. 598 Warren v. 496 Vos and Graves v. The Un. Ing. Co.

486 Vost, Batterman v.

522 V Vredenburgh v. Hallet and Bowne

425 Valentine, Manhattan Co. v.

584
v. Morris

447 Valentine, The People v.

460

Waddington and oth. Valkenburgh v. Dederick 437

ers v.

495 Van Alen v. Rogers 428, 457

v. White and Stout 441 v. Vischer

468 Van Alstyne, Brinckerhoff v. 555 V. Lownsberry's

W Adm'rs

556, 597 Van Antwerp, Jackson ex dem. Waddington and others v. Vredenburgh Sackrider v. 561

495 Van Bergen, Oudenarde v. 418 Walker, Ballard v.

60, 532 Van Bramer v. Ex’rs of Hoffman 488 Walker, Goodrich v.

463 Van Buren and Vosburgh v. Van

Walrod v. Spalbergh

438 Dycks 499, 574 Walton, Lasher v.

588 Vanderburgh v. Sturges 563 Wands, Ensign y.

439 Van Demar v. Van Zandt 484 Ward v. Haight

80, 533 v. Church 487 Wardell v. Eden

500 Vanderheuvel v. The United

Wardell, Ripley v.

586 Ins. Co. 486 Warren v. Conroy

259, 560 Vandervoort v. Columbia Ins. Co. 137, Williams, In re

466 542 Stewart y.

481 Vanderwecker, Cuyler v.

445
v. Un. Ins. Co.

495 Van Dine, Post v. 465 Waters, The People y.

433 Van Dycks, Van Buren and Vos

Wickham v.

418 burgh v. 499, 574 Watkins, Dobbin v.

415 Van Loon v. Driggs 419 | Watson v. Depeyster

580 Van Ness case y. 464 Wat ons, Halsey v.

581 Van Ness v. Hogeboom 514 Way v. Cary

593 Van Noost v. Classon 513 Weavel v. Lasher

464 Van Nuys v. Terhune 82, 535 Weatherwax, Fish v.

487 Van Orden, Britt y.

451 | Weaver v. Bentley 417, 573

9

[ocr errors]

Webster, Ensigo v.

440 | Wisner and others v. Wilcocks Wells v. Newkirk 448 and others

420 Wemple and another v. McDougall Wolcob and Van Orden, Abell v. 601

419 Woodhull and others v. Rumsey Wendover v. Ball 417

234, 558 Westchester, Judges of, The People v. Woodman and others, Little v. 420 420 Woods, Dill v.

454 Whalen, Shurtleff y.

561 Woods, Jackson ex dem. Cooder v. 438 Wheaton v. Slossen

470 Woodward, Quackenboss v. 470 Whitaker v. Cono

478, 501 Woodworth and others v. Lindsay White, Bancroft and Wife v. 590

Morgan v.

89 White, Leffingwell and another v. 427

and Kathbun v. Dole
Salstontal v.

443
and Judson

607
-, Spencer v.
430 Wright v. Anthony

537 White and Stout, Vredenburgh v. 441

Smith and Stanley v

574 v. Villers and Williams 439 Wyckoff, Combs v.

588 Whitney v. Russel 566 Wyncoop, Brazier v.

440 Wickham v. Gale and others 508

Duffin v.

569 Wilcock, Barnard v.

520 - y. Waters

418 Wilde v. Cantillon

435

Y Wilde v. Gilbert

423 Wilkie v. Roosevelt 66, 206, 532, 548 Yates v. Rozell

600 Willet, Newkerk v. 458 Young v. Canada

537 Williams, Bates v. 423 Young, People v.

582 Williamson v. Forman

503 Wilson, Jackson ex dem. Smith v. 294,

566

z Winter v. Carter

418
Mackhabay
588 Zobriski v. Baudes

599 Winton v. Saidler

185,546

[ocr errors]

CASES

ADJUDGED IN THE

SUPREME COURT OF JUDICATURE

OF THE

STATE OF NEW YORK,

IN JANUARY TERM, 1802.(a)

BROCKHOLST LIVINGSTON, Esq. Counsellor at Law, was appointed one of the

Judges of the Court, in the last vacation, and took his seat on the 19th

January. Smith Thompson, Esq. Counsellor at Law, was also appointed one of the

Judges of this Court, and took his seat on the 28th January.

The New YORK INSURANCE COMPANY against THOMAS.

A policy of insurance was effected on goods from Philadelphia to Hamburgh,

dated the 29th May, 1798, at 17 1-2 per cent.“ to return 15 per cent. in case an insurance has been effected in Europe." It also contained the following printed clause : “ Provided that if the assured shall have made any other assurance upon the premises prior in date to this policy, then the insurers shall be answerable only for so much as the amount of such prior assurance may be deficient, &c. and shall return the premium on so much of the sum assured as they shall, by such prior assurance, be exonerated from. And in case of any insurance upon the premises, subsequent in date

(@) (Old note.] The Reporter regrets that the written opinio delivered by Mr Chief Justice Lewis, and Mr. Justice Livingston, during the period of this volume, have been lost or destroyed, so that he can only express their concurrence with, or dissent from, the opinions of the other judges. Neither Mr. Justice Livingston, nor Mr. Justice Thompson, took any part in the de. cision of the causes in this term, here reported, as they were argued before they took their seats on the bench. VOL. III.

1

« ΠροηγούμενηΣυνέχεια »