Reports of Cases Argued and Determined in the Supreme Court of the Territory of Oregon, and of the State of Oregon: 1889/1880, Τόμος 18 |
Συχνά εμφανιζόμενοι όροι και φράσεις
action adverse possession agreement alleged answer appellant assessment authority Baker county Ben Holladay bill of exceptions blocks cattle cause charge charter circuit court circumstances city of East city of Portland claim common council common law complaint contract contributory negligence corporation county court court of equity Court-Lord Court-Strahan Court-Thayer damages decree deed defendant defendant's depot grounds duty East Portland entitled evidence executed executor exercise filed grantors guilty held Hill's Code Holladay horse Huffman improvement injury judgment jury land liable matter ment mortgage Multnomah county negligence Nickell notice Opinion Oregon parties partnership person plaintiff plat Pogue possession premises purpose question Railroad Railroad Co railway Rayburn real property reason record recover refused respondent road rule run at large Statement of facts statute STRAHAN street suit supra testified testimony THAYER thereof tion track train trial court unless verdict witness wood
Δημοφιλή αποσπάσματα
Σελίδα 360 - Every person who shall use or display the genuine label, trade mark, or form of advertisement of any such person, association or union, in any manner not authorized by such person, union or association, shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor, and shall be punished by imprisonment in the county jail not less than three months nor more than one year, or by a fine of not less than one hundred dollars nor more than two hundred dollars, or both.
Σελίδα 181 - A cause of action arising out of the contract or transaction set forth in the complaint as the foundation of the plaintiff's claim, or connected with the subject of the action ; 2.
Σελίδα 37 - The decree of the court below must, therefore, be reversed, and...
Σελίδα 400 - The first proposition is a general one, to this effect: that the plaintiff, in an action for negligence, cannot succeed if it is found by the jury that he has himself been guilty of any negligence, or want of ordinary care which contributed to cause the accident.
Σελίδα 220 - ... etc. As a result, the court found, as a conclusion of law, that the plaintiff was not entitled to any relief in equity, and that his suit be dismissed.
Σελίδα 199 - ... the judgment must be reversed and the case remanded to the circuit court, with directions to set aside the verdict and to order a new trial.
Σελίδα 385 - ... the accident could have been avoided by the exercise of ordinary care and diligence on the part of the defendant, the defendant is liable.
Σελίδα 400 - But there is another proposition equally well established, and it is a qualification upon the first, namely: that though the plaintiff may have been guilty of negligence, and although that negligence may, in fact, have contributed to the accident, yet if the defendant could in the result, by the exercise of ordinary care and diligence, have avoided the mischief which happened, the plaintiff's negligence will not excuse him.
Σελίδα 50 - For every man's land is, in the eye of the law, enclosed and set apart from his neighbor's; and that either by a visible and material fence, as one field is divided from another by a hedge, or by an ideal, invisible boundary, existing only in the contemplation of law, as when one man's land adjoins to another's in the same field.
Σελίδα 155 - Costs are allowed of course to the plaintiff, upon a judgment in his favor, in the following cases: 1.