FOLLOWING ARE MEMORANDA OF CASES DISPOSED OF AT OCTOBER TERM, 1906, WITHOUT OPINIONS AND NOT ELSEWHERE OR OTHERWISE REPORTED IN THIS EDITION. ROBERT A. MILLER, as Special Master, et | COVINGTON & CINCINNATI BRIDGE COMPANY, al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. NORTHERN ASSURANCE COMPANY. [No. 61.] In Error to the District Court of the United States for the District of Porto Rico. See same case below, 1 Porto Rico Fed. Rep. 420. Mr. Fritz V. Briesen for plaintiffs in error. Messrs. F. H. Dexter and F. D. McKenney for defendant in error. October 9, 1906. Dismissed, per stipulation, on motion of Mr. Frederic D. McKenney for the defendant in error. AMERICAN RAILROAD COMPANY OF PORTO RICO, Plaintiff in Error, v. JUAN MATIAS FERNANDEZ. [No. 95.] In Error to the District Court of the United States for the District of Porto Rico. Messrs. F. H. Dexter, F. D. McKenney, and J. S. Flannery for plaintiff in error. No appearance for defendant in error. October 9, 1906. Dismissed with costs, on motion of Mr. Frederic D. McKenney for the plaintiff in error. NEWPORT NEWS & OLD POINT RAILWAY & ELECTRIC COMPANY, Plaintiff in Error, v. HAMPTON ROADS RAILWAY & ELECTRIC COMPANY et al. [No. 5.] In Error to the Supreme Court of Appeals of the State of Virginia. See same case below, 102 Va. 795, 47 S. E. 839. Messrs. Fred Harper and S. Gordon Cumming for plaintiff in error. Mr. R. G. Bickford for defendant in error. October 9, 1906. Dismissed with costs, on motion of counsel for the plaintiff in error. ALLIANCE GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY, Appellant, v. THE CITY OF ALLIANCE. [Nos. 161 and 162.] Appeals from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of Ohio. Mr. Wm. B. Sanders for appellant. October 9, 1906. Dismissed with costs, on motion of counsel for the appellant. Plaintiff in Error, v. THE CITY OF COVINGTON. [No. 183.] In Error to the Court of Appeals of the State of Kentucky. Mr. 8. D. Rouse for plaintiff in error. No appearance for defendant in error. October 9, 1906. Dismissed with costs, on motion of counsel for plaintiff in error. OKLAHOMA GAS & ELECTRIC & ELECTRIC COMPANY, Plaintiff in Error, v. MYRTLE LUKERT. [No. 203.] In Error to the Supreme Court of the Territory of Oklahoma. Messrs. D. T. Flynn and C. B. Ames for plaintiff in error. Mr. Chester Howe for defendant in error. October 9, 1906. Dismissed, per stipula tion. UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, Appellant, v. ROBERT O. FINK, Treasurer, etc., et al. [No. 22.] Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Nebraska. Messrs. Maxwell Evarts and John N. Baldwin for the appellant. Mr. Norris Brown for appellee. October 9, 1906. Dismissed with costs, on motion of Mr. Maxwell Evarts for the appellant. CHICAGO, BURLINGTON, & QUINCY RAILWAY COMPANY, Appellant, v. A. F. CARLSON et al. [No. 23.] Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Nebraska. Messrs. Charles J. Greene and Ralph W. Breckenridge for the appellant. Mr. Norris Brown for appellee. October 9, 1906. Dismissed with costs, on motion of Mr. Maxwell Evarts in behalf of counsel for the appellant. 775 GEORGE D. COLLINS, Plaintiff in Error, v. | DELAWARE, LACKAWANNA & WESTERN RAIL THOMAS F. O'NEIL, Sheriff of the City and County of San Francisco, Cal. [No. 452.] In Error to the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco, State of California. Mr. William Hoff Cook for the defendant in error. October 9, 1906. Docketed and dismissed with costs, on motion of Mr. William Hoff Cook for the defendant in error. ROAD COMPANY, Petitioner v. WILLIAM W. RUTTER et al., Executors, etc. [No. 330.] Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. See same case below, 77 C. C. A. 315, 147 Fed. 51. Messrs. William D. Guthrie and Henry D. Hotchkiss for the petitioner. Mr. Augustus Van Wyck for the respondent. October 15, 1906. Denied. EAGLE ORE SAMPLING COMPANY, Petitioner, v. DUNCAN CHISHOLM, Trustee. [No. 142.] Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit. See same case below, 75 C. C. A. 472, 144 Fed. 670. Mr. Henry M. Teller for the petitioner. Messrs. C. A. Brandenburg, E. C. Brandenburg and Joel F Vaile for respondent. October 15, 1906. Denied. DAVID MACKENZIE, Petitioner, v. JAMES Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit. Mr. Robert G. Dyrenforth for the petitioner. Mr. Harris F Williams for the respondent. October 15, 1906. Denied. M. P. REEVE, Petitioner, v. NORTH CARO- Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the Mr. Henry H. Ingersoll for the petitioner. Mr. R. E. L Mountcastle for the respondents. October 15, 1906. Denied. SAGINAW MATCH COMPANY, Petitioner, v. Messrs. R. A. Parker and Charles F. Burton for the petitioner. Mr. John R. Nolan for the respondent. CUMBERLAND TELEPHONE & TELEGRAPH COM- ARTHUR WEINREB et al., Petitioners, v. United States Circuit Court of Appeals for JOSEPH H. FINK. [No. 305.] Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. See same case below, 76 C. C. A. 609, 146 Fed. 243. Mr. F. M. Czaki for the petitioners. the Sixth Circuit. See same case below, 76 C. C. A. 297, 145 Fed. 607. Mr. William L. Granbery for the peti tioner. No appearance for respondent. NEW YORK EVENING JOURNAL PUBLISHING 'COMPANY, Petitioner, v. JOSEPH SIMON. CARMELO GRECO, Petitioner, v. THE STEAM- [No. 441.] Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. See same case below, 77 C. C. A. 332, 147 Fed. 106. Mr. Wilford H. Smith for the petitioner. Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. See same case below, 77 C. C. A. 366, 147 Fed. 224. Messrs. Edward T. Fenwick and Clarence Mr. Edward K. Jones for the respondent. ATLANTIC TRANSPORT COMPANY, Claimant, | FRANK D. ZELL, Plaintiff in Error, v. etc., Petitioner, v. FRANCES M. BARNES. [No. 442.] Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the Mr. J. Parker Kirlin for the petitioner. JAMES P. STEWART et al., Petitioners, v. H. Mr. W. R. Robertson for the petitioners. ent. October 15, 1906. Denied. EX PARTE: IN THE MATTER OF THE SEN- JUDGES OF THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE In Error to the United States Circuit Messrs. C. L. Frailey, R. D. Brown, Malcolm Lloyd, Jr., Charles H. Burr, and A. S. Worthington for plaintiff in error. Messrs. D. Lawrence Grover, Tazewell Taylor and Hampton L. Carson for defendant in error. October 15, 1906. Order affirmed with costs. GRAHAM & MORTON TRANSPORTATION COM- United States for the Northern District of Mr. Charles E. Kremer for the appellant. Messrs. Harvey D. Goulder, S. H. Holding, and Frank S. Masten for the appellee. October 15, 1906. Decree affirmed with costs, on the authority of People's Ferry Co. v. Beers, 20 How. 393, 15 L. ed. 961; Roach v. Chapman, 22 How. 129, 16 L. ed. 294; Edwards v. Elliott, 21 Wall. 532, 22 L. ed. Motion for Leave to File Petition for a 487; The Robert W. Parsons (Perry v. Writ of Mandamus. Mr. Chester Howe for petitioners. Assistant Attorney General Van Orsdel for the United States. October 15, 1906. Denied. ATLANTIC TRUST COMPANY, Petitioner, v. EDGAR C. CHAPMAN, Receiver, etc., et al. [No. 413.] Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Haines) 191 U. S. 17, 48 L. ed. 73, 24 Sup. C. W. BUSTER et al., Appellants v. J. Appeal from the United States Circuit ELBERT R. ROBINSON, Petitioner, v. AMERICAN CAR & FOUNDRY COMPANY. [No. 165.] Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for Messrs. Edward B. Whitney and Stanley the Seventh Circuit. See same case below, W. Dexter for petitioner. Mr. Edgar C. Chapman for respondents. HENRY ARNOLD RICHARDSON, as Truseee, etc., Petitioner, v. JOHN M. SHAW et al. [No. 433.] Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. Mr. John Brooks Leavitt for petitioner. 68 C. C. A. 331, 135 Fed. 693. Mr. J. Gray Lucas for the petitioner. Messrs .Thomas A. Banning and Ephraim Banning for the respondent. October 22, 1906. Denied. SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY, Petitioner, v. MATTIE J. STUTTS, Administratrix, etc. [No. 318.] Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. See same case below, 75 C. C. A. 588, 144 Fed. 948. Mr. Milton Humes for the petitioner. Mr. Richard W Walker for the respond ent. October 22, 1906. Denied. OLD DOMINION STEAMSHIP COMPANY, Own- | DANIEL SULLIVAN, Plaintiff in Error, v. er, etc., Petitioner, v. PRIMUS GILMORE, Administrator, etc. [No. 350.] Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. Mr. Harrington Putnam for petitioner. Messrs. J. Parker Kirlin and George Whitfield Betts, Jr., for respondent. October 22, 1906. Granted. ABRAM ROSENBERGER, Petitioner, v. JOSEPH Messrs. J. J. Darlington and James C. Messrs. Solicitor General Hoyt and Assistant Attorney General Robb for the respondent. October 22, 1906. Denied. ST. LOUIS, BROWNSVILLE, & MEXICO RAIL- In Error to the Circuit Court of the- Messrs. L. G. Denman and Floyd McGown for the plaintiff in error. Messrs. A. W. Houston and Reagan Houston for the defendant in error. October 22, 1906. Judgment affirmed with costs. Rosenbaum v. Bauer, 120 U. S. 450, 30 L. ed. 743, 7 Sup. Ct. Rep. 633; Knapp v. Lake Shore & M. S. R. Co. (UnitStates ex rel. Knapp v. Lake Shore & M. S. R. Co.) 197 U. S. 541, 49 L. ed. 871, 25 Sup. Ct. Rep. 538. NORTH AMERICAN TRANSPORTATION & TRAD- In Error to the Supreme Court of the MORITZ EISNER et al., Petitioners, v. EMILIE State of Washington. See same case below, SAXLEHNER. [No. 414.] Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the 37 Wash. 694, 79 Pac. 778. Mr. Frederick Bausman for the plaintiff No counsel appeared for the defendant in United States Circuit Court of Appeals for in error. Messrs. Charles K. Allen, Leopold Wallach, and Charles G. Coe for the petitioners. Mr. Antonio Knauth for the respondent. October 22, 1906. Denied. JOSEPH J. WATERS, Administrator of Robert In Error to the Court of Appeals of the Mr. J. J. Waters for the plaintiff in error. Mr. William F. Mattingly for the defendants in error. October 22, 1906. Judgment affirmed with costs. See Jackson v. Emmons, 19 App. D. C. 250, 25 App. D. C. 146. error. October 22, 1906. with costs. Judgment affirmed Leon v. Galceran, 11 Wall. 185, 20 L. ed. 74; American S. B. Co. v. Chase, 16 Wall. 522, 21 L. ed. 369; The W. J. LAFFOON, Plaintiff in Error, v. J. F.. In Error to the Supreme Court of the State of North Carolina. See same case below, 138 N. C. 281, 50 S. E. 654. Mr. Louis M. Swink for the plaintiff in error. No counsel appeared for the defendant in error. October 22, 1906. Dismissed for want of jurisdiction. California Consol. Min. Co. v. J. A. AXTELL, et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. Manley, 203 U. S. 579, 51 L. ed. In Error to the Supreme Court of the State of Minnesota. See same case below, 94 Minn. 375, 102 N. W. 915, 6 L. R. A. (N. S.) 194. Messrs. Albert R. Allen, George E. Clarke, and C. M. O'Neill for the plaintiffs in error. Messrs. F. J. Knox and Andrew C. Dunn for the defendant in error. October 22, 1906. Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction. Beaupre v. Noyes, 138 U. S. 397, 34 L. ed. 991, 11 Sup. Ct. Rep. 296; National F. Ins. Co. v. Scheffer, 131 U. S. C. C. 111. Appx. and 26 L. ed. 1110. Sup. Ct. Rep. 779, and cases cited. - 27 JAMES VAN BUREN, Appellant, v. P. F. HENNESSEY, Testamentary Executor, etc., et al. [No. 65.] Appeal from the Circuit Court of the Branch K. Miller for appellant. CALIFORNIA CONSOLIDATED MINING COм- | ROSA M. COLE, Executrix, etc., Petitioner, v. CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS et al. [No. 465.] In Error to the Supreme Court of the Mr. J. H. Forney in support of the motion to dismiss. Mr. M. A. Folsom in opposition thereto. October 22, 1906. Dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Green v. Van Buskerk, 3 Wall. 448, 18 L. ed. 245; Union Mut. L. Ins. Co. v. Kirchoff, 160 U. S. 374, 40 L. ed. 461, 16 Sup. Ct. Rep. 318; Haseltine v. Central Nat. Bank, 183 U. S. 130, 46 L. ed. 117, 22 Sup. Ct. Rep. 49; Schlosser v. Hemphill, 198 Ū. S. 173, 49 L. ed. 1000, 25 Sup. Ct. Rep. 654; Clark v. Roller, 199 U. S. 541-544, 5C L. ed. 300-302, 26 Sup. Ct. Rep. 141. W. W. ROSE, Plaintiff in Error, v. STATE OF KANSAS ON THE RELATION OF C. C. thereto. October 22, 1906. Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction. Smiley v. Kansas, 196 U. S. 447, 49 L. ed. 546, 25 Sup. Ct. Rep. 289; Nonconnah Turnp. Co. v. Tennessee, 131 U. S. clviii Appx. and 24 L. ed. 368; Newport Light Co. v. Newport, 151 U. S. 527, 38 L. ed. 259, 14 Sup. Ct. Rep. 429; Harrison v. Morton, 171 U. S. 38, 43 L. ed. 53, 18 Sup. Ct. Rep. 742. WILLIAM J. GALLAGHER, Plaintiff in Error, v. PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS. [No. 20.] In Error to the Supreme Court of the State of Illinois. See same case below, 211 Ill. 158, 71 N. E. 842. Mr. Charles H. Soelke for plaintiff in error. Mr. E. C. Lindley for defendant in error. October 22, 1906. Dismissed with costs, pursuant to the Tenth Rule. Messrs. Ferdinand Winter and Alexander C. Ayres for the petitioner. Messrs. Frederick E. Matson, Henry Warrum, and Merrill Moores for the respondents. October 29, 1906. Denied. FERDINAND EIDMAN, Collector, etc., Petitioner, v. FREDERICK B. TILGHMAN et al., Executors, etc. [No. 208.] On Writ of Certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. See same case below, 69 C. C. A. 139, 136 Fed. 141. Messrs. Assistant Attorney General McReynolds, Assistant Attorney General Robb and Solicitor General Hoyt for the peti tioner. Mr. E. B. Whitney for the respondents. October 29, 1906. Judgment affirmed with costs by a divided court, and cause remanded to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York. THOMAS F. WILSON (on Behalf of the Territory of Arizona), Appellant, v. N. O. MURPHY et al. [No. 6.] Appeal from the Supreme Court of the Mr. Eugene S. Ives for appellant. THOMAS F. WILSON (on Behalf of the Mr. Eugene S. Ives for appellant. costs. FREDERICK H. VOGT, Appellant, v. MATILDA S. VOGT by her Guardian ad Litem, Pauline Vogt. [No. 62.] Appeal from the Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia. See same case below, ALEXANDER D. SHAW et al., Petitioners, v. 26 App. D. C. 46. Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. See same case below, 75 C. C. A. 291, 144 Fed. 329. Mr. John C. Gittings for the appellant. Messrs. J. J. Darlington and Leon Tobriner for appellee. October 29, 1906. Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction. Schlosser v. Hemphill, 198 Mr. Edward S. Hatch for the petitioners. | U. S. 173, 49 L. ed. 1000, 25 Sup. Ct. Rep. Mr. Solicitor General Hoyt for the re- 654; California Consol. Min. Co. v. Manley, spondent. 203 U. S. 579, 51 L. ed., 27 Sup. Ct. October 29, 1906. Denied. Rep. 779, and cases cited. |