AMENDMENTS TO RULES SUPREME COURT OF ILLINOIS 1 Amendment to paragraph 4 of Supreme the points and authorities relied upon for Court rule 41, adopted February 5, 1920: Fourth-Each volume of the Reports shall contain at least six hundred and seventy pages, and shall be of the same general character, typographically, as those heretofore published by the present reporter, subject to such changes as the court may, from time to time, specially direct. The paper upon which the Reports may be printed shall be a clear, white paper, supersized and calendered, and of not less than fifty pounds to the ream. The Reports shall be bound in a good quality of art vellum (cloth) and the boards used in binding shall be good tar boards. NEW RULE IN COMPENSATION CASES Supreme Court rule 43 as amended February 17, 1920. The amendment merely changes the second sentence of the rule as originally adopted. Rule 43. In case application shall be made for a writ of error to review any judgment or order of court under the Workmen's Compensation Act there shall be filed a petition for the writ signed by the applicant or his attorney, together with a transcript of the proceedings and judgment of the trial court, with an assignment of errors written upon or attached to the transcript, and with proof of notice to the respondent. There shall be filed with such transcript the transcript of proceedings of the Industrial Commission filed with the clerk of the circuit court. The petitioner shall file with his petition an abstract of the record, prepared in accordance with rules 14 and 16 of this court. The petition shall contain a concise statement of the case and of the issuance of the writ. Twelve copies of such petition and abstract shall be filed with the clerk of this court within the time allowed by said Workmen's Compensation Act for the filing of said petition asking for a writ of error. If the petition is filed in vacation the respondent may file a reply within seven days after notice of the filing of the petition, and if the petition is filed at a term a reply may be filed on or before the following Tuesday. Such reply shall state briefly and concisely the points and authorities relied upon to meet or obviate the alleged errors and sustain the judgment, which reply shall constitute an appearance in the case. Twelve copies of such reply shall be filed. Oral arguments will not be heard upon such application. In case the writ shall not be granted the transcript of the record of the trial court shall be returned forthwith to the clerk of the court from which the record was brought. The application shall be docketed, "- -, Petitioner, v. 9 Respondent." If the petition shall be granted the cause shall be docketed thereafter as in cases of ordinary writs of error, the petitioner being designated as plaintiff in error, but shall retain the original number of the petition, and no additional docket fee shall be required of the petitioner. A scire facias to hear errors shall be issued in the manner provided by rule 6, returnable on the first day of the next term for all respondents who have not appeared in opposition to the petition. If the petition is granted the cause shall proceed as if pending on writ of error. Either party may file a further brief or abstract or submit the cause on the petition and abstract or reply filed by such party on the application for the writ. 1 For other rules, see 111 N. E. vi; 115 N. E. vii; 116 N. E. vii; 124 N. E. vii. 125 N.E. (vii)* Applebaum, Hartford Fire Ins. Co. of 237 161 356 83 Armour, City of Rockford v. (Ill.) Atchison, T. & S. F. R. Co. v. Stamp (Ill.) 381 Board of Education of Glen Ellyn Tp. 7 274 Boger, Board of Education of Glen Ellyn Board of Education of City of New York, Wilds v. (N. Y.)... 89 921 380 740 Boone, People v. (Ill.). 723 912 Attorney General, Boston Safe Deposit & Trust Co. v. (Mass.)... Borah Drainage Dist. v. Farris (Ill.). Borden's Condensed Milk Co., Goldberg v. (N. Y.) .... 889 807 392 Attwill, Peirce v. (Mass.) 609 Boston Elevated R. Co., Corwell v., two cases (Mass.) 607 Ayshire Coal Co. v. West (Ind. App.)... 84 Boston Elevated R. Co., Leonard V. (Mass.) 593 Boston Elevated R. Co., McNiff v., two cases (Mass.) 391 Baker, City of Indianapolis v. (Ind. App.) 52 Boston Herald, Gardiner v. (Mass.) 561 .... Baker, People v. (Ill.) 263 Baker, Pittsburgh, C., C. & St. L. R. Co. v. (Ind. App.).... 233 Boston Ins. Co., Morrison v. (Mass.).... 698 Boston Safe Deposit & Trust Co. v. Attorney General (Mass.).. 392 Baldwin Locomotive Works v. Edward Hines Lumber Co. (Ind.). 400 Boston Safe Deposit & Trust Co. v. Wall (Mass.) 853 Bank of Buffalo v. Wendel (Ohio). 111 Botelho v. Siebert (N. Y.). 912 Banks, People v. (Ill.)... 723 Bowden v. Owen (N. Y.).. 913 Barksdale v. State (Ind.). 515 Bowen v. Jones (Mass.)... 142 Barnard, Folger v. (Ind. App.) 460 Bowers, Miami Conservancy Dist. V. Barnard Mfg. Co. v. Eugen C. Andres Co. (Mass.) (Ohio) 876 781 Barnes, Ryan v. (Ind. App.). 643 Bowman v. Chenango (N. Y.). 809 Barnett, Federal Life Ins. Co. v. (Ind. App.) Bowne v. Colt (N. Y.).. 913 522 Boyd, Brackney v. (Ind. App.). 238 Barnhart v. American Concrete Steel Co. (N. Y.).. Brackney v. Boyd (Ind. App.) 238 675 Bartonville Bus Line, State Public Utilities Commission v. (Ill.). Bradley Contracting Co., Hoykendorf (N. Y.) 373 Brand, In re (N. Y.). 913 Bashwitz Bros. & Co., Dugas v. (N. Y.) 916 Bresnahan, People v. (Ill.).. 723 Batchelor v. State (Ind.) 773 Brooks, Greene v., two cases (Mass.) 685 Batchelor v. State (Ind.) 778 Brumfiel, State v. (Ind.). 40 Bay Bottoms Drainage Dist. v. Stokes (Ill.) 716 Bay State St. R. Co., Harvey v. (Mass.).. 614 Bay State St. R. Co., Mones v. (Mass.).. 151 Bearse v. Lebowich (Mass.) 621 614 Bryan, City of Indianapolis v. (Ind.). 38 924 Bullock, Adams v. (N. Y.). Bundy v. Bowman (Ind. App.)....... 781 Chandler v. Fisher (Ill.). 324 Coulson, Lamson v. (Mass.). 551 Cheney & Son, Lamb v. (N. Y.)... Christlieb v. Christlieb (Ind. App.).............. Crawley v. Howe (Ill.) . . Crobaugh, Rider v. (Ohio). Crosby v. Simpson (Mass.). Crouch v. Parker (Ind.). 817 414 Councilman, Magenheimer v. (Ind. App.) Cowles v. Springfield Gaslight Co., two cases (Mass.) 77 589 743 130 616 453 378 486 Crowell v. Boston Elevated R. Co., two cases (Mass.) 607 574 Cunningham, Dunne v. (Mass.) 560 Cincinnati, I. & W. R. Co., City of Chrisman v. (Ill.). Cuppy v. Ward (N. Y.) 915 292 Curnen v. Ryan (N. Y.).. 915 705 Cincinnati, I. & W. R. Co., Waking v. (Ind. App.) 799 Cinofsky v. Industrial Commission (Ill.).. 286 327 Current v. Current (Ind. App.)..... 779 282 290 634 City of Chicago v. Keogh (Ill.). 881 ... Daniels & Pickering Co., Pittsburgh, C., C. & St. L. R. Co. v. (Ind. App.).. 426 D'Argenio, Palmigiani v. (Mass.). 592 292 Davidson, New Albany Box & Basket Co. City of Chrisman v. Cusick (Ill.). City of Cleveland v. Public Utilities Commission (Ohio) 290 v. (Ind.) 904 Davis v. Babb (Ind.). 403 City of Corning v. Holmes (N. Y.). 913 City of Corning v. O'Neill (N. Y.)... 914 Davis v. Tremont Trust Co. (Mass.)..... 603 Davis v. Worcester Consol. St. R. Co. Decker v. Hall (Ind. App.).. 786 86 921 24 86 374 Dennin v. Finucane, two cases (N. Y.).. 915 Dennin v. Finucane, three cases (N. Y.)... 916 De Somma, 'People v. (N. Y.).. 921 Devinny, People v. (N. Y.). 543 (Mass.) 394 Dexter v. Young (Mass.). 862 City of Worcester, Parsons v., two cases (Mass.) Clapp v. American Exp. Co. (Mass.).. Clark v. McClain Fire Brick Co. (Ohio).. 877 Clarkson, In re (N. Y.)... Dime Savings & Trust Co., Montgomery 914 Dodd v. 461 Eighth Ave. Co. (N. Y.) Donahey, State v., two cases (Ohio). 916 908 Clevenger v. State (Ind.) 41 Doras, People v. (Ill.). . 2 Clyde S. S. Co., Florida Cotton Oil Co. v. Dougherty v. Salt (N. Y.).. 94 855 Coddington v. Nees (Ind. App.). 657 Douglas, Lake Erie & W. R. Co. v. (Ind. App.) 474 Coen, Du Bois v. (Ohio) 121 Downing v. Jordan Marsh Co. (Mass.) 207 Cohen, Commonwealth v. (Mass.) Cohen v. New York, O. & W. R. Co. (N. Y.) 914 Cohen, People v. (N. Y.) 921 Coleman, McBride v. (Ind.). 449 Dugas v. Bashwitz Bros. & Co. (N. Y.)... 916 Dunne v. Cunningham (Mass.). 560 Coler v. Seidelman (N. Y.)... Collins v. C. L. Centlivre Brewing Co. (Ind. App.) 791 Earle v. Earle (N. Y.).. 917 |