To this end, regard should be had, not so much to the nature and character of the various powers conferred, as to the object and purpose of the legislature in conferring them. If granted for public purposes exclusively, they belong to the corporate body... Michigan Reports: Cases Decided in the Supreme Court of Michigan - Σελίδα 691των Michigan. Supreme Court, Randolph Manning, George C. Gibbs, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Jennison, Herschel Bouton Lazell, Hovey K. Clarke, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, William Dudley Fuller, John Adams Brooks, Marquis B. Eaton, James M. Reasoner, Richard W. Cooper - 1909Πλήρης προβολή - Σχετικά με αυτό το βιβλίο
| 1905 - 992 σελίδες
...confusion. In separating them, regard must be had to theobject of the legislature in conferring them. If granted for public purposes exclusively, they belong to the corporate body in it* public, political, or municipal character. But if the grant was for purposes of private advantage... | |
| 1906 - 810 σελίδες
...confusion. In separating them, regard must be had to the object of the legislature in conferring them. If granted for public purposes exclusively, they belong...derive a common benefit therefrom, the corporation ¡¡114111! hoc is to be regarded as a private company. It stands on the same footing as would any... | |
| 1906 - 1076 σελίδες
...of the various powers conferred. as to the object and purpose of the Legislature In conferring them. If granted for public purposes exclusively, they belong...political, or municipal character. But If the grant was for the purpose of private advantage and emolument, though the public may derive a common benefit therefrom,... | |
| California. Supreme Court - 1906 - 854 σελίδες
...and municipal character; but if for purposes of private advantage and emolument, though the public derive a common benefit therefrom, the corporation,...quoad hoc, is to be regarded as a private company." (Id. sec. 38.) And they add. in a note to the same section, that "it is npon the like distinction that,... | |
| Abraham Clark Freeman - 1906 - 1144 σελίδες
...purposes exclusively, it is governmental, but if for private advantage and emoluments, though the public derive a common benefit therefrom, the corporation quoad hoc is to be regarded as a private corporation: Stevens v. Muskegon, 111 Mich. 72, 60 NW 229, 36 ]..!•" A. 777. So also it is said that... | |
| 1907 - 1366 σελίδες
...powers, public and private, regard must be had to the object of the legislature in conferring them. If granted for public purposes exclusively, they belong...character; but, if the grant was for purposes of private advantages and emolument, although the public may derive a common benefit therefrom, the corporation,... | |
| Abraham Clark Freeman - 1907 - 1150 σελίδες
...various powers conferred, as to the object and purpose of the legislature in conferring them. If 512 granted for public purposes exclusively, they belong...political or municipal character. But if the grant was for the purpose of private advantage and emolument, though the public may derive a common benefit therefrom,... | |
| Abraham Clark Freeman - 1907 - 1142 σελίδες
...various powers conferred, as to the object and purpose of the legislature in conferring them. If 512 granted for public purposes exclusively, they belong...political or municipal character. But if the grant was for the purpose of private advantage and emolument, though the public may derive a common benefit therefrom,... | |
| Chicago (Ill.). City Council - 1908 - 40 σελίδες
...of the various powers conferred, as to the object and purpose of the Legislature in conferring them. If granted for public purposes exclusively, they belong...derive a common benefit therefrom, the corporation, quo ad hoc, is to be regarded as a private company. It stands on the same footing as would any individual... | |
| Albert Hutchinson Putney - 1908 - 416 σελίδες
...— public and private — regard must be had to the object of the legislature in conferring them. If granted for public purposes exclusively, they belong...character; but if the grant was for purposes of private advantages and emolument, though the public may derive a common benefit therefrom, the corporation... | |
| |