To this end, regard should be had, not so much to the nature and character of the various powers conferred, as to the object and purpose of the legislature in conferring them. If granted for public purposes exclusively, they belong to the corporate body... Michigan Reports: Cases Decided in the Supreme Court of Michigan - Σελίδα 691των Michigan. Supreme Court, Randolph Manning, George C. Gibbs, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Jennison, Herschel Bouton Lazell, Hovey K. Clarke, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, William Dudley Fuller, John Adams Brooks, Marquis B. Eaton, James M. Reasoner, Richard W. Cooper - 1909Πλήρης προβολή - Σχετικά με αυτό το βιβλίο
| Mississippi. Supreme Court, Thomas Alexander Marshall, William C. Smedes, Volney Erskine Howard, Robert John Walker, John Franklin Cushman, James Zachariah George - 1850 - 866 σελίδες
...of the various powers conferred, as to the object and purpose of the legislature in conferring them. If granted for public purposes exclusively, they belong to the corporate body in its public, municipal, or political character. But if the grant was for purposes of private advantage and emolument,... | |
| 1920 - 540 σελίδες
...rights of sovereignty, but exercises merely the functions of a private corporation,"21 that "* * * though the public may derive a common benefit therefrom,...corporation quoad hoc is to be regarded as a private corporation. It stands on the same footing as would any individual or body of persons upon whom the... | |
| Louisiana. Supreme Court - 1920 - 668 σελίδες
...character of the various powers conferred, as the object and purpose of the legislature in conferring them. If granted for public purposes exclusively, they belong to the corporate body in its public or municipal character. But if for the purposes of private advantage, though the public may derive... | |
| Ohio. Supreme Court - 1899 - 694 σελίδες
...ordinarily constituted, are possessed of a double character — the one public, and the other private. If granted for public purposes exclusively, they belong...if the grant was for purposes of private advantage or emoluments, though the public may derive a common benefit therefrom, the corporation, quo ad hoc,... | |
| California. Supreme Court - 1906 - 786 σελίδες
...presumptions as natural persons." In speaking of municipal corporations, they say: "If the powers conferred be granted for public purposes exclusively, they belong to the corporate body in its public and municipal character; but if for purposes of private advantage and emolument, though the public... | |
| Pennsylvania. Supreme Court - 1859 - 594 σελίδες
...of the various powers conferred, as to the object and purpose of the legislature in conferring them. If granted for public purposes exclusively, they belong...if the grant was for purposes of private advantage, or emolument, though the public may derive a common benefit therefrom, the corporation, quoad hoc,... | |
| Oscar Lewis Pond - 1925 - 1180 σελίδες
...— public and private — regard must be had to the object of the legislature in conferring them. If granted for public purposes exclusively, they belong...character; but if the grant was for purposes of private advantages and emolument, though the public may derive a common benefit therefrom, the corporation,... | |
| 1891 - 468 σελίδες
...— public and private, — regard must be had to the object of the legislature in conferring them. If granted for public purposes exclusively, they belong...character; but if the grant was for purposes of private advantages and emolument, though the public may derive a common benefit therefrom, the corporation,... | |
| Illinois. Appellate Court, Martin L. Newell, Mason Harder Newell, Walter Clyde Jones, Keene Harwood Addington, James Christopher Cahill, Basil Jones, James Max Henderson, Ray Smith - 1908 - 718 σελίδες
...had to the object of the legislature in conferring them. If City of Chicago v. University of Chicago. granted for public purposes exclusively, they belong...character; but if the grant was for purposes of private advantages and emolument, though the public may derive a common benefit therefrom, the corporation... | |
| Kentucky. Court of Appeals, James Hughes, Achilles Sneed, Martin D. Hardin, George Minos Bibb, Alexander Keith Marshall, William Littell - 1892 - 762 σελίδες
...in which the State at large had no interest. It was said in Bailey v. City of New York, 3 Hill, 539: "But if the grant was for purposes of private advantage...derive a common benefit therefrom, the corporation (the city), quoad hoc, is to be regarded as a private company. It stands on the same footing as would... | |
| |