[ Λυπούμαστε, το περιεχόμενο αυτής της σελίδας είναι περιορισμένο ]

[ Λυπούμαστε, το περιεχόμενο αυτής της σελίδας είναι περιορισμένο ]

...consideration, obnoxious to the provisions of Section 21, Article V of the Constitution, which prescribes that "no law shall embrace more than one object which shall be expressed in the title." For this reason I cannot approve the bill. Respectfully, ALEX. J. GROESBECK, Governor....

[ Λυπούμαστε, το περιεχόμενο αυτής της σελίδας είναι περιορισμένο ]

...and to make an appropriation to carry out the provisions hereof." The constitutional provision that "No law shall embrace more than one object, which shall be expressed in its title" is mandatory, and a failure on the part of the legislature to obey it is sufficient to void the law....

...and to make an appropriation to carry out the provisions hereof. The constitutional provision that " No law shall embrace more than one object, which shall be expressed in its title " is mandatory, and u failure on the part of the legislature to obey it is sufficient to void the law....

...organize as a corporation was unconstitutional, because it violated the constitutional provision that "no law shall embrace more than one object, which shall be expressed in its title." The Supreme Court held the statute unconstitutional for this reason.1 Henry M. Duffield, for plaintiff...

...title, and for that reason contravenes the provision of our State Constitution which provides that no law shall embrace more than one object which shall be expressed in its title. ALBERT E. SLEEPER. May 13, 1919 From Journal of the Senate, pp. 1679-1680 To THE PRESIDENT OF THE SENATE:...

...bridge and eventually retire its bonds. Section 20 of article IV of the Constitution of Michigan says, "No law shall embrace more than one object, which shall be expressed in its title," and therefore, when the complainant was organized under the statute referred to, it was organized as...

...the statute aforesaid invalid under section 52 of the State Constitution, which provides that—"No law shall embrace more than one object, which shall be expressed in its title * * *" The question must be answered in the negative. The assignment of error raising this question...