...plaintiff had a verdict. The court set the verdict aside, and ordered a nonsuit. The ruling was in form that there was no evidence of negligence to go to the jury; but this was obviously equivalent to saying, and did in fact mean, that the railroad company had done all...

...the trial to move to enter a nonsuit, and the defendants appealed from the judgment, on the ground that there was no evidence of negligence to go to the jury, and on other grounds set out in the pracipe on appeal. ' The appeal was heard by HOWELL, CJA, PERDUE...

...ordinary use of the yard. Therefore, though I think that the case is somewhat near the line, I agree that there was no evidence of negligence to go to the jury. Appeal allowed. Solicitors for plaintiff: Smith, Rundell, & Dods, for Morgan, Bruce, & Nicholas, Pontypridd....

...the Court of Appeal is, whether or not the defendants are entitled to have a new trial on the ground that there was no evidence of negligence to go to the jury under the first count of the declaration, assuming it was true, as sworn, that everything had been...

...the points of law to be argued in arrest of judgment. Mr. Simon, on behalf of the prisoner, submitted that there was no evidence of negligence to go to the jury ; that negligence in law is want of due care ; that in the present case the prisoner was not bound...

...the dissent of Kelley, CB in the court of exchequer, and Justice Keating, in the exchequer chambers, that there was no evidence of negligence to go to the jury. Chief Baron Kelly was of the opinion that the stopping of the train, without any notice to the passengers...

...backwards, and the plaintiff was thrown off. The Court of King's Bench (Madden, Kenny, and Wright, JJ.), held that there was no evidence of negligence to go to the jury, affirming the direction of Dodd, J., who presided at the trial. And the Court of Appeal (Sir S. Walker,...

...testified accordingly, and no other evidence was offered on his behalf. The trial Judge, being of opinion that there was no evidence of negligence to go to the jury, dismissed the action : — Held, that, the door being opened when the car was not at a stopping place,...

...cases of Blacker v. Lake and Bates \. Batey rf Co. may probably be justified on the di(ferent ground that there was no evidence of negligence to go to the jury. See also Longmeid v. Holliday (1851), 6 Ex. 761; Elliott v. Hall (1885), 15 QBD 315; Caledonian Railway...

...258 Fed. 109 (2nd Circ., 1919); and Hardy v. Missouri Pacific, 266 Fed. 860 (Sth Circ., 1920), it was held that there was no evidence of negligence to go to the jury. In Heller v. NYNH & HRR Co., 265 Fed. 192 (2nd Circ., 1920), the court found it unnecessary to determine...