...to the course of the Court. 117. No set-off of damages or costs between parties shall be Set-off not allowed to the prejudice of the attorney's lien for costs in the p^ud^'of particular suit against which the claim of set-off is made ; pro- Attorney1* videcl, nevertheless,...

...and a lien by operation of law. Tho plaintiff's counsel relied upon R. G- of HT 18-53, "No set-olfof damages or costs between parties shall be allowed to the prejudice of the attorney s lien for costs in the particular suit against which the set-off is sought," but the reply...

...opposite party. Ko- 274428. No set-off of damages or costs between parties shall be sct-on of co«t» H at the suit of JK in the sum 429. A statute made and passed in the session of Parliament costs on <i«mag<» held in the third and...

...of Hilary Term 1853, r. 63, no set-off o£ damages or costs between parties was to be allowed, fco the prejudice of the attorney's lien for costs in...particular suit against which the set-off is sought. This, however, must be taken subject to the limitation adopted in the recent decision of Prmgle v....

...plaintiff, contended that Rule 875 must be read with and was limited by Rule 1205, which is as follows : " No set-off of damages or costs between parties shall be allowed to the prejudice of the solicitor's lien for costs in the particular action against which the set-off is sought ; provided,...

...year 1832, the practice was made uniform ; and at the present time no set-off of damages or costs is allowed, to the prejudice of the attorney's lien for...particular suit against which the setoff is sought, except as to interlocutory costs in the same suit, (y) In the different States of the Union, the practice...

...the general costs of the cause, the costs of the trial shall be allowed to the opposite party. 75. No set-off of damages or costs between parties shall be allowed to the prejudice of the attorney's lieu for costs in the particular suit against which the set-off is sought ; provided, nevertheless,...

...of Brearey v. Kemp (m), in which it is said that there is a General Eule of practice of 1853, that "no set-off of damages or costs between parties shall...particular suit, against which the set-off is sought." The facts of the present case are inapplicable to that rule; supposing they were applicable, it is...

...parties shall be allowed to the prejudice of the solicitor's lien for costs in the particular action against which the set-off is sought; provided, nevertheless, that interlocutory costs in the same action awarded to the adverse party may be deducted. The questions raised here are: (1) Whether the...

...540Stephens v. Weston, 3 B. & C. 535.) The rule of Court Hilary Term, 2 Wm. 4, is also relied upon. ' No set-off of damages or costs between parties shall...sought, provided, nevertheless, that interlocutory was justified in directing the plaintiff to pay to th defendant the costs of the action at the same...