...create restrictions, was held to be invalid by reason of the exemption of agricultural productions or live stock while in the hands of the producer or raiser. A similar case is that of Colling v. Kansas City Stock Yards VOL. CXCVI — 18 Opinion of the Court....

...certain persons, and inapplicable to others, because section 9 of the act declared that its provisions " shall not apply to agricultural products, or live...stock while in the hands of the producer or raiser," the act was repugnant to the Fourteenth Amendment, as denying to some within its jurisdiction of "the...

...certain persons, and inapplicable to others, because section 9 of the act declared that its provisions "shall not apply to agricultural products, or live...stock while in the hands of the producer or raiser," the act was repugnant to the Fourteenth Amendment, as denying to some within its jurisdiction of "the...

...Montana hatten in ihren Anti-Trust-Gesetzen die Bestimmung aufgenommen, daß diese Gesetze „schall not apply to agricultural products or live stock while in the hands of the producer or raiser". Andere Staaten, ua Nebraska nahmen Arbeiterorganisationen zwecks Erzielung höherer Löhne aus. (Die...

...on the other, may be inferred from the 9th section of the act of 1893, which says: "The provisions of this act shall not apply to agricultural products,...stock, while in the hands of the producer or raiser." After a few litigations under this act, the legislature proceeded to revise the law again by the act...

...embraced in these words as quoted in the opinion at page 554, near the bottom: "Section 9. The provisions of this act shall not apply to agricultural products...stock while in the hands of the producer or raiser." This act shall not apply to, first, agricultural products in the hands of the producer or raiser; second,...

...the United States, by reason of the fact that by the, ninth section it declares that " the provisions of this act shall not apply to agricultural products or live stock while in the hands of producer or raiser." The Circuit Court held this section to be repugnant to the Fourteenth Amendment...

...trade, declaring contracts in violation of its provisions void, etc., provides (section 9) that it shall not apply to agricultural products or live stock while in the hands of producers. Held, that such section rendered the entire act void, as a violation of section 1 of the...

...drastic act was passed, of this sort, but it wound up with this remarkable statement : 5 "The provisions of this act shall not apply to agricultural products or live stock in the hands of the producer or raiser; nor be so construed as to affect any combination or confederation...

...combinations of capital, skill or acts for certain specified purposes, but exempting from its operation agricultural products or live stock while in the hands of the producer. By reason of this exemption the statute was adjudged to operate as a denial of the equal protection...