 | Francis Buchanan Tiffany - 1903 - 672 σελίδες
...wrong. The general rule is that the master is answerable for every such wrong of the servant o«agent as is committed in the course of the service and for the master's benefit. * * * It may be said * * * that the master has not authorized the act. It is true, he has not authorized... | |
 | 1904 - 858 σελίδες
...v. English Joint Stock Bank (1867), Ex. Ch. LR, 2 Ex. 259, said, "The master is answerable for every such wrong of the servant or agent as is committed...express command or privity of the master be proved." In other words, the doctrine of "respondent superior" is something more than a pedantic expression of... | |
 | 1904 - 1114 σελίδες
...contends is the liability of a master for the torts of his servant. "The master is answerable for every such wrong of the servant or agent as is committed...express command or privity of the master be proved." Baricick v. English Joint Stock Bank, LR 2 Exch. 259, 265, 36 LJ Exch. NS 147, 16 LT N. 8. 461, 15... | |
 | Francis Reynolds Yonge Radcliffe, Sir John Charles Miles - 1904 - 648 σελίδες
...fraud and the case of any other wrong. The general rule is, that the master is answerable for every such wrong of the servant or agent as is committed...express command or privity of the master be proved 3 . That principle is acted upon every day in running down cases. It has been applied also to direct... | |
 | Edwin Charles Goddard - 1904 - 780 σελίδες
...Barwick v. English Joint Stock Bank, LR 2 Ex. 259, 265, "is that the master is answerable for every such wrong of the servant or agent as is committed...express command or privity of the master be proved." See also Limpus v. London General Omnibus Co., 1 H. & C. 526. The fraud was in respect to a matter... | |
 | John Dawson Mayne - 1904 - 1186 σελίδες
...master for his servant at civil law, " the general rule is, that the master is answerable for every such wrong of the servant or agent as is committed...though no express command or privity of the master be shown."1 And provided it was done in the course of his employment, it makes no difference that the... | |
 | Institute of Bankers (Great Britain) - 1904 - 721 σελίδες
...liable for every " such wrong of his servant or agent as is committed in the course I <. ( ( " of his service and for the master's benefit though no express " command or privity of the master can be proved." He then gives instances where this rule has been acted on and proceeds : — " In all... | |
 | 1904 - 1078 σελίδες
...contends is the liability of a master for the torts of his servant. "The master is answerable for every such wrong of the servant or agent as is committed in the «ourse of the service and for the master's benefit, though no express command or privity of the master... | |
 | 1905 - 874 σελίδες
...fraud and the case of any other wrong. The general rule is, that the master is answerable for every such wrong of the servant or agent as is committed...express command or privity of the master be proved. That principle is acted upon every day in running down cases. It has been applied also to direct trespass... | |
 | Ratanlal Ranchhoddas, Dhirajlal Keshavlal Thakore - 1905 - 622 σελίδες
...LIABILITY OF MASTER TO THIRD PERSONS. The master is answerable for every such wrong of the servant as is committed in the course of the service and for...though no express command or privity of the master be proved1. Although the particular act which gives the cause of action may not be authorized, still,... | |
| |
The general rule is, that the master is answerable for every such wrong of the servant or agent as is committed in the course of the service and for the master's benefit, though no express command or privity of the master be proved. 
