 | 1916
...of the crop grown to be placed in the silo because of the delay may reasonably be supposed to have been in the contemplation of the parties when the contract was made, and for this loss the seller is liable. [Ed. Note. — For other cases, see Sales, Cent. Dig. § 1197... | |
 | Horace Gay Wood - 1886
...literal compliance with the said provisions of the policy concerning1 buckets, was not required and could not have been in the contemplation of the parties when the policy was made, but all that was required by the plaintiff in order to comply with such stipulation... | |
 | 1900
...the direct and proximate consequence of the breach, aud so connected with the stipulation as to have been in the contemplation of the parties when the contract was made. Express Co. v. Egbert, 36 Pa. St 3GO; Billmeyer v. Wagner, Ul Pa. St. 92. In the opinion in the case... | |
 | 1887
...rates. It was mentioned merely incidentally. The defendant is only liable for such damages as may have been in the contemplation of the parties when the contract was made: Ruthven Woollen Co. \: Great Western RW Co., 18 CP 316; Hadleyv. Boxendale, 9 Ex. 341; Home v. Midland... | |
 | John Mews - 1889 - 58 σελίδες
...part of the plaintiff, it ceases to have any application : it cannot be applied to other circumstances which could not have been in the contemplation of the parties when the contract was made. ВмЬ. v. Whitehaven Trustees, 52 JP 392— D. B. contracted with W. in the month of June to lay a... | |
 | Abraham Clark Freeman - 1890
...are the natural and proximate result of the company's default, and may be fairlyconsidered to have been in the contemplation of the parties when the contract was made: Parti v. Alia California Tel. Co., 13 Cal. 422; 73 Âm. Dec. 689; Wattern union Tel. Co. v. Graham,... | |
 | Alfred Arthur Hudson - 1895
...such circumstances, it ceases to have any applica" tion ; it cannot be applied to other circumstances which could not have "been in the contemplation of the parties when the contract was made." Now what were the circumstances when the contract was made ? It was a contract made in August to run... | |
 | Louisiana. Supreme Court - 1896
...the reason they did not have them in stock. All the items of damage above referred to were not, and could not have been, in the contemplation of the parties when the contract was entered into, and they are not the immediate and proximate consequence of the violation of the... | |
 | United States. Comptroller of the Treasury - 1896
...construed to have reference to the particular contingency which happened and which could hardly have been in the contemplation of the parties when the contract was made. (Chicago, etc., Ry. Go. v. Hoyt, 149 U. 8., 1-15.) I am therefore of the opinion that that clause of... | |
| |