 | John Pitt Taylor - 1848 - 764 σελίδες
...believe in the existence of a certain state of things, and induces him to act on that belief, so as to alter his own previous position, the former is...different state of things as existing at the same time (z). Indeed, the principle may be laid down still more broadly, as precluding any party, who negligently... | |
 | Florida. Supreme Court - 1848 - 786 σελίδες
...to believe the existence of a certain state of things, and induces him to act on that belief, so as to alter his own previous position, the former is...different state of things as existing at the same time; and the plaintiff in this case might have parted with his interest in the property, by verbal gift... | |
 | 1848 - 470 σελίδες
...to believe the existence of a certain state of things, and induces him to act on that belief, so as to alter his own previous position, the former is...different state of things as existing at the same time."3 In applying these principles, let us pause for one moment to consider what objects the original... | |
 | Great Britain. Court of Exchequer, William Newland Welsby, Edwin Tyrrell Hurlstone, John Gordon - 1849 - 892 σελίδες
...complaining of the seizure of the goods as their own. The rule laid down by the Court of Queen's Bench, that, " where one, by his words or conduct, wilfully...different state of things as existing at the same time ;" and, again, " a party who negligently or culpably stands by, and allows another to contract on the... | |
 | William Johnson, New York (State). Supreme Court - 1849 - 866 σελίδες
...believe in the existence of a certain state of things, and induces him to act on that belief, so as to alter his own previous position, the former is...different state of things as existing at the same time." (See the above principle affirmed in Gregg v. Wells, 2 F. & Dav. 296, 9 A. A E. 90 ; Coles v. Bank... | |
 | Great Britain. Bail Court - 1850 - 808 σελίδες
...Sears (a). That rule is, that " where one by his words or conduct wilfully causes another to believe the existence of a certain state of things, and induces...state of things as existing at the same time." That rule was founded on previous authorities, on the cases of Graves v. Key (b), and Heane v. Rogers (c),... | |
 | 1852 - 890 σελίδες
...believe in the existence of a certain state of things, and induces him to act on that belief so as to alter his own previous position, the former is...different state of things as existing at the same time. Marsh v. Smith, 5 R. 523 ; McMasters v. Atchafalaya Co. 1 A. 11 ; Blanchard v. Allain^ 5 A. 368. See... | |
| |
But the rule of law is clear, that, where one by his words or conduct wilfully causes another to believe the existence of a certain state of things, and induces him to act on that belief, so as to alter his own previous position, the former is concluded... 
