 | Illinois. Appellate Court, Martin L. Newell, Mason Harder Newell, Walter Clyde Jones, Keene Harwood Addington, James Christopher Cahill, Basil Jones, James Max Henderson, Ray Smith - 1908
...upon and pressed in argument, is that the court erred in refusing the peremptory instruction asked by the defendant at the close of the plaintiff's evidence and again at the close of the evidence, the contention of appellant being VOL. 133.] Goodman v. Bigler. that there is no evidence... | |
 | Illinois. Appellate Court, Martin L. Newell, Mason Harder Newell, Walter Clyde Jones, Keene Harwood Addington, James Christopher Cahill, Basil Jones, James Max Henderson, Ray Smith - 1908
...the platform of said turn-table and the wall surrounding the same, by means whereof she was injured. At the close of the plaintiff's evidence, and again at the close of all evidence, the defendant moved the court to direct a verdict of not guilty, which the court refused... | |
 | Illinois. Appellate Court, Martin L. Newell, Mason Harder Newell, Walter Clyde Jones, Keene Harwood Addington, James Christopher Cahill, Basil Jones, James Max Henderson, Ray Smith - 1911
...C., C., C. & St. L. Ry. Co., 158 1ll. App. 237. A motion was made by the defendant at the conclusion of the plaintiff's evidence, and again at the close of all the evidence, to direct a verdict in favor of the defendant. It is urged as error that the court erred in overruling... | |
 | Missouri. Courts of Appeals - 1908
...erred in refusing the defendant's peremptory instruction to find the issues for the defendant, asked at the close of the plaintiff's evidence and again at the close of the whole case. Francis v. Railroad, 118 Mo. Smith v. Railroad. App. 436; Railroad v. Kavanaugh, 163... | |
| |