...not just and reasonable In the U'. Va.) SOUTHEASTERN REPORTEE, VOL. 15. (W. Va. eye of the law. It la not just and reasonable, in the eye of the law, for...to stipulate for exemption from responsibility for the negligence of himself or his servants." It is further held in the same case, arguendo: "That a...

...627, the syllabus of the case is as follows: "(1) A common carrier cannot lawfully «stipulate for exemption from responsibility when such exemption...not just and reasonable In the eye of the law. (2) It is not Just and reasonable in the eye of the law for a common carrier to stipulate for exemption...

...case the conclusion was based upon the proposition that a common carrier cannot lawfully stipulate for exemption from responsibility when such exemption is not just and reasonable in the eye of the law; that it is not just and reasonable in the eye of the law for a common carrier to stipulate for exemption...

...stipulate for exemption from loss occasioned by his own negligence or that of his servants. Such an exemption is not just and reasonable in the eye of the law. Nor is it necessary for us to so hold in order to sustain the contract under consideration. For, as...

...view stated above; and it was held that it was not just and reasonable, and was against the policy of the law, for a common carrier to stipulate for exemption from responsibility for the negligence of itself or its servants. Whether or not a contract between a municipal corporation...

...803. The primary reason why a carrier cannot, in this respect, shift its responsibility and duty, Is that it is not just and reasonable, in the eye of the law, to permit It by contract to relieve itself from responsibility for the negligence of itself or servants,...

...the court reached the following conclusions: (1) That a common carrier cannot lawfully stipulate for exemption from responsibility when such exemption...to stipulate for exemption from responsibility for the negligence of himself or his servants." Under these rules, and the elaborate reasoning upon which...

...judges, reaching the following conclusions: "1. That a common carrier cannot lawfully stipulate for exemption from responsibility, when such exemption...to stipulate for exemption from responsibility for the negligence of himself or his servants. 3. That these rules apply both to nominon carriers of goods...

...the court reached the following conclusions: (1) That a common carrier cannot lawfully stipulate for exemption from responsibility when such exemption...carrier to stipulate for exemption from responsibility 1'or the negligence of himself or his servants." Under these rules, and the elaborate reasoning upon...

...degrees, in fixing the quantum points are ruled : 1. That a common carrier cannot lawfully stipulate for exemption from responsibility, when such exemption...and reasonable in the eye of the law, for a common carried to stipulate for exemption from responsibility for the negligence of himself or his servants....