...Penal Code of the State of Texas, sa as to exempt from operation of the anti-trust laws of this State agricultural products or live stock while in the hands of the producer and making it lawful for persons engaged in work or labor to associate together and form unions or...

...431, one of the cases cited by the circuit court, is not, in our opinion, applicable. Tlip statute did not apply to agricultural products or live stock while in the hands of the producer or raispr. It was held that this exemption rendered the statute void, as denying to persons within the...

...was held invalid under this same clause because it contained the excepting provision that it should " not apply to agricultural products, or live stock while in the hands of the producer or raiser." That was a stronger case than this because there the^ whole statute was one dealing with economic policy...

...the United States, by reason of the fact that by the ninth section it declares that ' the provisions of this act shall not apply to agricultural products or live stock while in the hands of producer or raiser.' " We can best state what the court held by quoting from its opinion as follows...

...was held invalid under this same clause because it contained the excepting provision "that it should not apply to agricultural products or live stock while in the hands of the producer or raiser." That was a stronger case than this because there the whole statute was one dealing with economic policy,...

...invalid under this same clause because it contained the excepting provision "that it should not ap[>ly to agricultural products or live stock while in the hands of the producer or raiser." That was a stronger case than this because there the whole statute was one dealing with economic policy,...

...competition, to limit production, to fix prices, etc.". In section 9 it was provided that "the provisions of this act shall not apply to agricultural products or live stock while in the hands of 167 the producer or raiser". This discrimination, the court held, was not a reasonable classification,...

...was held invalid under this same clause because it contained the excepting provision that it should " not apply to agricultural products or live stock while in the hands of the producer or raiser." That was a stronger case than this because the whole statute was one dealing with economic policy and...

...other, and of all other laws ill any way affecting them now in force in this state. "13. The provision of this act shall not apply to agricultural products...stock while in the hands of the producer or raiser." That portion of the fourteenth amendment of the constitution of the United States referred to in the...

...that its price might in any manner be affected." But § 9 of the act provided that " The provisions of this act shall not apply to agricultural products...stock while in the hands of the producer or raiser." 25 The Court said, at pp. 562, 563: "A state may in its wisdom classify property for the purposes of...